News & Analysis as of

Algorithms Abstract Ideas Patents

Hudnell Law Group

Federal Circuit Issues First Word on AI Patent Eligibility

Hudnell Law Group on

On April 18, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a patent infringement suit brought by Recentive Analytics, Inc. against Fox Corporation. See Recentive Analytics, Inc. v....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Broadcast Alert! Applying Conventional Machine Learning to New Data Isn’t Patent Eligible

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that patents applying established machine learning methods to new data are not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101. Recentive Analytics, Inc....more

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP

Overcoming Obstacles to Securing Patents for AI-Related Inventions

Companies in multiple industries are experimenting with artificial intelligence to generate specific solutions to long-standing challenges. To this end, numerous companies are filing patent applications for inventions...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Intellectual Property Tips for America’s Quantum Hub

There has been a flurry of activity in Illinois over the last few months with regards to quantum computing. For example, the state enacted a package of bills that provides tax incentives for quantum computing development,...more

ArentFox Schiff

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB Decisions Holding Computer-Based Diagnostic Method Claims Ineligible

ArentFox Schiff on

Decision highlights the need for applicants to focus on additional improvements to technology when drafting and prosecuting applications directed to computer-implemented diagnostics methods. On March 25, 2021, the Federal...more

Haug Partners LLP

Federal Circuit affirms PTAB finding of patent ineligibility: a “new or different use of a mathematical process” is still a...

Haug Partners LLP on

On March 11, 2021, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding that claims directed to a novel mathematical process to generate genetic inheritance data was patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C.S. § 101 and Alice. In In re...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Method for Determining Haplotype Phase Found Subject Matter Ineligible

McDermott Will & Emery on

In an appeal from a final rejection of a pending application, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to methods for determining “haplotype phase” were correctly rejected under 35 USC § 101...more

Knobbe Martens

Innovative Data Processing Is an Ineligible Algorithm

Knobbe Martens on

In Re THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES - Before Prost, Lourie, and Reyna. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A claim directed to an innovative mathematical process to generate data was a patent ineligible...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Federal Circuit Rules Public Key Cryptography Algorithm Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Note:  The below is a sarcastic parody, in the spirit of our earlier sarcastic parodies. WASHINGTON D.C., June 23, 1984.  In a unanimous decision, the Federal Circuit has ruled U.S. Patent No. 4,405,829 invalid under 35...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Overview of Comments on the USPTO's July 2015 Update to the Interim Examination Guidance

Fenwick & West LLP on

In late July, the USPTO issued its July 2015 Update to the 2014 Interim Section 101 Patent Eligibility Guidance (IEG). The July 2015 Update addresses a number of the issues and concerns raised in the public comments to the...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide