News & Analysis as of

Amusement Parks Injury-in-Fact

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

City of Rye Lacks Standing to Challenge a Westchester County Board of Legislators Decision

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Over the past several years, this blog has presented several posts on the topic of standing. It is a frequent topic because it is often raised as a threshold issue in zoning and land use cases....more

Polsinelli

Lawsuit Under Biometric Law Does Not Require Harm

Polsinelli on

In a unanimous decision, the Illinois Supreme Court found that a Six Flags pass holder had a valid claim as an “aggrieved person” under the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act of 2008 (“BIPA”), hence having the right to bring an...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Roller Coaster Start to the New Year for Biometrics: Rosenbach v. Six Flags and Emerging Biometric Laws

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Illinois heightens the risks faced by companies collecting biometric information by holding that an individual who is the subject of a violation of Illinois’ Biometric Information...more

Sands Anderson PC

Supreme Court of Illinois Expands Grounds for Standing in Privacy Suits

Sands Anderson PC on

As the number and scale of cases involving the theft or loss of personal information grows, so does the number of plaintiffs filing suit as a result. One of the most difficult hurdles for these plaintiffs to clear is the...more

Carlton Fields

Illinois Supreme Court Finds No Actual Harm Needed to Sue Under State’s Biometric Privacy Statute

Carlton Fields on

The Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.) (BIPA) requires that companies obtain written consent and disclose how they collect, retain, disclose and destroy biometric identifiers such as retina or...more

Jones Day

Illinois Supreme Court Rules that Plaintiff Is "Aggrieved" Under State Biometrics Statute Despite Alleging No Injury

Jones Day on

The Situation: The Illinois Supreme Court recently considered whether a person can sue as an "aggrieved" person under the Illinois Biometrics Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") even if the person has not alleged some actual...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Biometric Privacy Update – Actual Harm Not Required

Since the passage of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) in 2008, it has been used by plaintiffs’ attorneys to sue companies that use biometric identification technologies. Many BIPA cases have failed...more

Fisher Phillips

Illinois Supreme Court Ruling: Biometric Privacy Law Only Requires Violation, Not Actual Harm

Fisher Phillips on

On January 25, 2019, the Illinois State Supreme Court ruled that the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) only requires individuals to show violation of the law to bring suit. Businesses with a presence in...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Illinois Supreme Court Adopts Expansive Interpretation of Standing under Illinois BIPA, Potentially Opening the Flood Gates for...

In a much-anticipated ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court recently held that allegations of actual injury are not required to seek damages under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA or the Act). The case is...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Actual Injury Unnecessary to Sue Under Illinois Biometric Law

The Illinois Supreme Court recently handed down its much-anticipated decision in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation et al., clarifying what makes someone “aggrieved” and able to bring a claim under the Illinois...more

Carlton Fields

No Actual Harm Needed to Sue Under BIPA: Illinois Supreme Court Finds Statutory Violation Sufficient

Carlton Fields on

The Illinois Supreme Court has issued its highly anticipated decision involving the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/1 et seq.) (BIPA), which requires that companies obtain written consent and disclose...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Rosenbach Is The Beginning, Not The End, Of BIPA Litigation

The Illinois Supreme Court’s decision last week in Rosenbach v. Six Flags may have closed the first of what will be several chapters in class action litigation arising from the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act...more

Mintz - Privacy & Cybersecurity Viewpoints

No Harm, Still a Foul: Illinois Supreme Court Rules on the Collection of Biometric Data

Leaving its fingerprints all over the privacy debate, the Illinois Supreme Court handed down a ruling that will significantly impact litigation under the state’s unique Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA” or “Act”),...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Illinois Supreme Court: No ‘Actual Harm’ Required for Biometric Information Privacy Act Claims

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Illinois Supreme Court held on January 25, 2019, that plaintiffs filing suit under the Biometric Information Privacy Act—which regulates how private entities disclose and discard biometric identifiers—do not need actual...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

No Actual Damages Required to Sue Under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Illinois Supreme Court held on January 25, 2019, that plaintiffs filing suit under the Biometric Information Privacy Act—which regulates how private entities disclose and discard biometric identifiers—do not need actual...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Illinois Supreme Court Opens Floodgates For Damages In Class Actions Alleging Violations of the Illinois Biometric Information...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Illinois Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff may sue for mere violation of BIPA, regardless of injury. ...more

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

Client Alert: The Illinois Supreme Court Has Spoken on Biometric Privacy – And It's Bad News for Businesses

On Friday, January 25, 2019, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Rosenbach v. Six Flags – and the unanimous opinion is bad news for businesses in the State. ...more

Franczek P.C.

It's BAAA-aaack - Illinois Supreme Court Revives Biometric Data Claims

Franczek P.C. on

Back in 2008, Illinois enacted what at the time must have seemed like a relatively obscure law to address privacy concerns associated with biometric information – the Biometric Information Privacy Act or “BIPA”. At the time,...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

Individuals Need Not Allege Actual Injury to Sue for Damages Under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act

On January 25, 2019, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court held that, under that state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), a person need not suffer actual injury or adverse effect in order to bring suit under the...more

Franczek P.C.

Illinois Supreme Court Case Recognizes Low Bar for Biometric Information Liability

Franczek P.C. on

In a decision issued late last week, the Illinois Supreme Court allowed a private citizen to sue a company for failing to provide written notice and obtain a signed release before collecting his fingerprint data in violation...more

Hogan Lovells

Illinois Supreme Court Says Infringement of Rights Under Biometric Act Is Sufficient for Standing, Even Absent Additional Harm

Hogan Lovells on

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled on January 25 in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp. that a plaintiff can allege a violation of rights under the state’s Biometric Information Protection Act (BIPA) even without...more

21 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide