News & Analysis as of

ANDA

FDA Includes Patent Submission Date Updates In Orange Book

by Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP on

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently updated the Orange Book to include patent submission dates. A patent submission date is the date the FDA receives patent information from the NDA holder. For each patent...more

District Courts Split over Proper Patent Venue for Hatch-Waxman Act Litigation

by Morgan Lewis on

There have been two interpretations of the “acts of infringement” language in the patent venue statute regarding ANDA submissions in Hatch-Waxman litigation....more

Eli Lilly and Company v. Perrigo Co. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

In an appeal decided last month, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana finding claim 20 of U.S. Patent No. 8,435,944 to be invalid as obvious. The panel also...more

Hatch-Waxman Venue: The New Narrow?

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

The issue of venue—where geographically a case can be brought—and jurisdiction are a pair of principles to determine in which forum a case can properly be brought. Jurisdiction in personam concerns whether a particular party...more

Federal Circuit Review - November 2017

by Knobbe Martens on

Fractured Federal Circuit Holds Patent Owner Does Not Bear Burden of Persuasion in IPR Motions to Amend - In Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal, Appeal No. 2015-1177, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, held that a patent...more

New FDA Guidance On Determining Whether To Submit An ANDA Or A 505(b)(2) Application

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently published a draft guidance summarizing the differences between abbreviated new drug applications (ANDA) and 505(b)(2) applications. Both sections were added to the FD&C Act...more

Secondary Considerations Transformed into Rebuttal Evidence

by McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing the issue of prima facie obviousness, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that evidence of secondary considerations failed to overcome a strong showing of obviousness....more

Horizon Pharma, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Horizon Pharma, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Inc., 11-2317 (MLC) (DEA), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107707 (D.N.J. July 12, 2017) (Cooper, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Vimovo® (naproxen / esomeprazole...more

Claim to Gel Formulation Not Obvious Over Prior Art Liquid Formulation

by McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing the issue of whether a topical gel with an increased concentration of active ingredient would have been obvious over a prior art liquid product, the US District Court for the District of New Jersey concluded that...more

Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Par Pharm., Inc., Civ. No. 1:15-cv-173-RGA, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106491 (D. Del. July 11, 2017) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Prepopik® (sodium picosulfate, magnesium...more

Pfizer Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Pfizer Inc. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., No. 15-79-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125634 (D. Del. Aug. 9 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Toviaz® (fesoterodine fumarate extended-release tablets);...more

How to Pay the Piper: FDA Issues New Guidances for PDUFA VI and GDUFA II

by Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

FDA recently issued two draft guidances: Assessing User Fees Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments of 2017 (PDUFA VI) and Assessing User Fees Under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2017 (GDUFA II), which...more

NJ Court Grants Exceptional Case Fees Based on Speculative Infringement Suit

by McDermott Will & Emery on

The US District Court for the District of New Jersey awarded Luitpold more than $210,000 in fees and costs under 35 USC § 285 after granting its motion for judgment on the pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) (ANDA Update,...more

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Nos. 15-2155 (RMB/JS), 15-4524 (RMB/JS), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133998 (D.N.J. Aug. 22 2017) (Bumb, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Mucinex® (guaifenesin);...more

Bayer Pharma AG v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

The Federal Circuit reversed a finding of non-obviousness on Friday based on clear error by the District Court on factual underpinnings of its obviousness determination, in Bayer Pharma AG v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. Such...more

Allergan Sales, LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Allergan Sales, LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., Civ. No. 2:15-cv-01471-FRG-RSP, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127886 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2017) (Payne, M.J.). Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Delzicol® (mesalamine); U.S....more

Tris Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Tris Pharma, Inc. v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc., No. 14-1309-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143299 (D. Del. Sept. 5, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Quillivant XR® (methylphenidate...more

Federal Circuit Finds Orally Disintegrating Drug Formulation Obvious

In Bayer Pharma AG v. Watson Labs., Inc., No. 2016-2169 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2017), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s conclusion that certain claims of Bayer’s patent covering Staxyn would not have been obvious...more

Federal Circuit Splits on Approach to Analyzing Graham Factors

by BakerHostetler on

In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the asserted claims of Merck’s U.S. Patent No. 6,486,150 (the ’150 patent) were obvious despite evidence of commercial...more

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc.

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., Civ. No. 17-379-LPS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146372 (D. Del. Sept. 11, 2017) (Stark, J.)... Drug Product and U.S. Patent: Eliquis® (apixaban); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Summary of FDA Guidance on Determining Whether to Submit an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) Application

On October 13, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released for comment, by December 12, 2017, draft guidance for industry entitled, Determining Whether to Submit an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) Application. The purpose...more

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – November 2017

In this appeal, the Federal Circuit will consider whether it has jurisdiction to review a PTAB decision to terminate an IPR and enter an adverse judgment against the patent owner. Arthrex argues that the Court has...more

Kowa Co. Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Kowa Co. Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, No. 14-CV-2758 (PAC), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS ______ (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 19, 2017) (Crotty, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Livalo® (pitavastatin); U.S. Patent No....more

Process Discoverable by “Merely Ordinary Experimentation” Rendered Obvious

In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Hospira, Inc., No. 2017-1115 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 26, 2017), a divided Federal Circuit panel affirmed the district court’s finding that a claimed process for making a chemical compound was obvious....more

Invalidation Of A Claim In A Closely-Related Patent Dooms Preliminary Injunction

by Orrick - IP Landscape on

In Sebela Int’l Ltd. v. Actavis Labs., FL, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 17-4789-CCC-MF & 17-4964-CCC-MF (D.N.J. Sep. 14, 2017), plaintiffs Sebela International Limited, Sebela Ireland Limited, and Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc....more

494 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 20
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.