News & Analysis as of

Appeals Tariffs Imports

Pillsbury - Global Trade & Sanctions Law

Two Federal Courts Invalidate “Reciprocal” and Other Emergency Tariffs, But Relief Paused Pending Appeal

In a landmark decision, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) has ruled against President Trump’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In its decision (involving two...more

Morgan Lewis

Courts Invalidate President’s IEEPA Tariffs, But Stays Keep Duties on Imports—for Now

Morgan Lewis on

The US Court of International Trade and the US District Court for the District of Columbia have invalidated President Donald Trump’s actions imposing tariffs pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of...more

WilmerHale

IEEPA Tariff Litigation: What You Need to Know About the Federal Court Decisions Threatening the Trump Administration’s Tariff...

WilmerHale on

Last week, two federal courts struck down sweeping tariffs that the Trump Administration had recently imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). ...more

Mayer Brown

IEEPA Tariffs at a Crossroads: Courts Intervene, What Comes Next?

Mayer Brown on

Last week, two different district courts found that President Donald Trump did not have the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) to impose sweeping tariffs....more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

U.S. Court of International Trade Rules on Legality of Tariffs

On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT), a U.S. federal court with special expertise in customs and international trade laws, released the anticipated first ruling on the lawfulness of tariffs...more

Polsinelli

Court Strikes Down Fentanyl and Reciprocal Tariffs, but Appeals Court Temporarily Stays Impact

Polsinelli on

Key Takeaways - The U.S. Court of International Trade struck down President Trump’s fentanyl and reciprocal tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA), ruling the statute did not...more

Benesch

Trump Tariffs Permanent Injunction - What it Means and What to Expect

Benesch on

On May 28th, 2025, the Court of International Trade issued a judgment striking down several of the worldwide tariffs imposed by President Trump in the first and second quarters of 2025. ...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

Federal Trade Court Rules Trump Administration’s Use of Emergency Commerce Law to Impose Broad Tariffs Was Unlawful

Amundsen Davis LLC on

On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) determined that the Trump administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) to impose (1) overly broad worldwide...more

BakerHostetler

US Court of International Trade Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs

BakerHostetler on

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on Wednesday, May 28, that tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – namely the tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China to...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

The U.S. Court of International Trade Stops Several IEEPA Tariffs

Warner Norcross + Judd on

On May 28, the U.S. Court of International Trade in a case challenging tariffs issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) filed by V.O.S. Selections, Inc. and other plaintiffs, and joined in...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Economic Prong of Domestic Industry Requirement Includes All Sorts of Labor and Capital

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under Section 337(a)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a US International Trade Commission decision,...more

ArentFox Schiff

China Import Duties Here to Stay? CIT Upholds Section 301 Tariffs

ArentFox Schiff on

On March 17, 2023, the Court of International Trade upheld the legality of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese origin products included on the Office of the US Trade Representative’s List 3 and List 4A, however the case will...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Section 301 Litigation: Is It Too Late to Seek Refunds?

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Court of International Trade's (CIT) docket is brimming these days, all thanks to importers who have initiated more than 3,500 actions to date challenging the Trump Administration's use of Section 301 of the Trade...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Section 232 Survives the Federal Circuit

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

US Court of International Trade Confirms Limits to Section 232 Action

In just one opinion, the landscape surrounding national security tariffs has undergone a dramatic shift. In Transpacific Steel LLC v. United States, an otherwise narrow dispute regarding steel imports from Turkey subject to...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

U.S. Court of International Trade Confirms Limits to Section 232 Action

In just one opinion, the landscape surrounding national security tariffs has undergone a dramatic shift. In Transpacific Steel LLC v. United States, an otherwise narrow dispute regarding steel imports from Turkey subject to...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Section 232 Survives the U.S. Court of International Trade. What’s Next?

In late March, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued a highly anticipated opinion addressing Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Section 232 authorizes the President to take measures against imports...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide