News & Analysis as of

AZ Supreme Court

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Decides Cipro’s Black Box Warning Cannot Replace an Expert Opinion

Snell & Wilmer on

In Arizona, civil claims against health care professionals must be accompanied by a certified statement regarding whether “expert opinion testimony is necessary to prove the health care professional’s standard of care or...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Energy Law: Month in Review - July 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Welcome to Dorsey’s Energy Law: Month in Review. We provide this update to our clients to identify significant developments in the previous month....more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Holds Agreement Violates Gift Clause: What Gilmore v. Gallego Teaches Us About Multi-Party Service Contracts...

Snell & Wilmer on

Economic incentive agreements are tools used by city, county, and state actors to facilitate public goals with the help of private actors. States that provide incentives to developers to promote economic growth have a...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

State Supreme Court Decisions Severely Restrict Access to Abortion in Arizona and Florida

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the federal constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, individual states continue to decide the legality of abortion on a...more

Snell & Wilmer

Property Owned by Non-Indians and Located on Tribal Land Is Subject to Property Tax

Snell & Wilmer on

Generally, tribal lands held in trust by the federal government are exempt from state and local taxation under Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (the Act). However, when non-Indians are involved in ownership...more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona Supreme Court Expands Eligibility for Unemployment Benefits

Jaburg Wilk on

A recent Arizona Supreme Court (Barriga v. ADES/Precision) decision has broadened the circumstances that can establish intolerable work conditions in order to receive unemployment benefits after quitting. The key issue in...more

Lewis Roca

2023 Arizona Tax in Review

Lewis Roca on

On September 12, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to take review in ADP, LLC v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, No. CV-23-0036-PR., which lets stand the Arizona Court of Appeals decision upholding the taxation of SaaS. 254 Ariz....more

Lewis Roca

SaaS is Taxable in Arizona as the Rental of Tangible Personal Property Despite No Statutory Authority to Tax Digital Services

Lewis Roca on

On September 12, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to take review in ADP, LLC v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, No. CV-23-0036-PR., which lets stand the Arizona Court of Appeals opinion in the same case. 254 Ariz. 417, No. 1 CA-TX...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Legal Consequences of Election Official Errors Involving Referendums

Snell & Wilmer on

There are a lot of moving parts to election administration, and it takes a lot of people to make them work. Not surprisingly, mistakes are made on occasion. The consequences of those mistakes often end up in court. In this...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Methods to Challenge Citizen Initiatives

Snell & Wilmer on

For those involved in the citizen initiative process, there are lessons to be learned from the Arizona Supreme Court’s recent decision involving a challenge to the signatures obtained by certain initiative petition...more

Snell & Wilmer

Coverage Construction: Arizona Supreme Court’s Osborn III Opinion

Snell & Wilmer on

In Fidelity National v. Osborn III Partners LLC, the Arizona Supreme Court recently decided the question of whether mechanics’ liens filed by a general contractor are a construction lender’s “own darn fault” if the liens...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Arizona Supreme Court Decision Could Affect Lending Practices

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Construction lenders beware – a recent Arizona Supreme Court decision interpreting Exclusion 3(a) of standard-form title-insurance policies could mean lenders are not insured against a senior mechanics’ lien if the lender’s...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Taxation of Tribal Work Performed Under Federal Contracts Upheld by U.S. Supreme Court Precedent

Snell & Wilmer on

A three-panel Arizona Court of Appeals ("the panel”) unanimously ruled on January 10, 2023, that, under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the gross proceeds from work performed under federal contracts on Native American...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Unwavering Un-waivable Implied Warranty of Workmanship and Habitability in Arizona

Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Supreme Court recently issued an opinion on the scope of the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability (the “implied warranty”) in contracts between homebuyers and builder/vendors that provides clear...more

Snell & Wilmer

Check Your Privilege: The Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies the Scope and Application of the Legislative Privilege in Fann v. Kemp

Snell & Wilmer on

The ability to petition one’s leaders is long recognized regardless of the form of government. Ever since the Watergate Scandal, the United States has taken the lead on transparency in governmental acts and the interaction...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Weighs In on Standards Applicable to Initiative Petitions in Leibsohn v. Hobbs

Snell & Wilmer on

Arizona is one of the most progressive states when it comes to citizen led initiatives to create or change (and literally enshrine) laws. However, the procedure to put such initiatives to vote are largely controlled by the...more

White and Williams LLP

Public Policy Prevails: Homebuilders and Homebuyers Cannot Agree to Disclaim Implied Warranty of Habitability in Arizona

White and Williams LLP on

In Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC, et al., 2022 Ariz. LEXIS 309, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that a homebuilder and homebuyer could not waive or disclaim the implied warranty of workmanship and habitability. While the court...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Confirms Importance of Implied Warranties of Workmanship and Habitability

Snell & Wilmer on

n late September 2022, Arizona’s Supreme Court issued a new opinion important for any person or company working in residential construction. The Court’s opinion in Zambrano v. M & RC II LLC, et al affirms the importance of...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Arizona Supreme Court Confirms that Judgment Liens Attach to Homestead Property

Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Supreme Court recently clarified that a judgment lien does, in fact, attach to the proceeds of the sale of a homestead property. See In re McLauchlan. In sum, if the sale of a home produces more than the homestead...more

Jaburg Wilk

Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies and Heightens Punitive Damages Standard in Negligence Cases

Jaburg Wilk on

The Holding - In Swift Trans. Co. of Az., LLC. v. Carman in and for County of Yavapai, — Ariz. —, 515 P.3d 685 (Aug. 23, 2022), a bodily injury and wrongful death case arising from a tractor-trailer accident, the Arizona...more

Snell & Wilmer

No Longer Foreseeable? Cal-Am’s Impact for the Construction Industry

Snell & Wilmer on

Clarifying its case law, Arizona’s Supreme Court further limited when foreseeability can establish a duty for tort liability in its recent Cal-Am opinion. Key for contractors and design professionals, while the decision could...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Confronts Applicability of State Ad Valorem Tax on Tribal Land

Snell & Wilmer on

On April 26, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court issued a significant unanimous decision addressing the applicability of a state ad valorem property tax on a power plant located on Indian land. The Arizona Supreme Court held that...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Rejects Unforeseeable HOA Amendments

Snell & Wilmer on

In Maarten Kalway v. Calabria Ranch HOA LLC, et al., the Arizona Supreme Court weighed in on the issue of whether a homeowners' association (“HOA”) may rely on a general-amendment-power provision in its covenants, conditions,...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Is Arizona The Beginning Of The End For Peremptory Challenges?

On August 30, 2021, the Arizona Supreme Court instituted a landmark rule change that made Arizona the first state in the country to abolish the use of peremptory challenges in criminal and civil trials.  Challenges to...more

Carlton Fields

Arizona Supreme Court Finds That Reasonableness of Insurer’s Refusal to Consent to Settlement Under D&O Policy Is in the Eye of...

Carlton Fields on

In Apollo Education Group Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, the Arizona Supreme Court found that the reasonableness of the insurer’s decision to refuse to consent to settlement under a directors and...more

77 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide