News & Analysis as of

Banks Duty of Care

Conyers

Beyond the Betrayal: Navigating Strategies for Victims of APP Fraud

Conyers on

Authorised Push Payment (“APP”) fraud, where victims are tricked into authorising payments to fraudsters, resulted in losses of £485.2m in 2022 and is reported to have risen by 22% in 2023. With consumer protection laws...more

Hogan Lovells

When push comes to shove - UK Supreme Court issues definitive guidance on banks' Quincecare duties

Hogan Lovells on

The UK Supreme Court in Philipp (Respondent) v Barclays Bank UK Plc (Appellant) [2023] UKSC 25 has confirmed that the so-called "Quincecare duty" – a duty on a bank to refrain from executing a payment instruction from its...more

Goodwin

Overdraft Protection Programs: Risk Management Practices

Goodwin on

Regulatory Developments - Overdraft Protection Programs: Risk Management Practices - On April 26, the OCC issued guidance in OCC Bulletin 2013-12, “Overdraft Protection Programs: Risk Management Practices,” to...more

Mayer Brown Free Writings + Perspectives

Maintaining Perspective: Governance and Disclosure Reminders for Public Companies

Companies will be affected in a variety of ways by the receivership of Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank or any other similarly situated financial institution. Companies may face difficulty accessing bank facilities or the...more

BCLP

Banking Bites - June 2022

BCLP on

New High Court case considers nature and scope of the Quincecare duty - In June, the Court of Appeal expanded the scope of a bank’s duty of care to protect its customers from fraud to encompass instructions by those other...more

Cohen & Gresser LLP

A New Angle on Banks’ Duties to Customers in Fraud Cases: Philipp v Barclays

Cohen & Gresser LLP on

What is the scope of banks’ duties to customers in executing their customers’ instructions? In particular, what are banks’ duties if the instruction is the instrument of fraud? Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal...more

White & Case LLP

Court of Appeal: Banks’ Quincecare duty may apply to instructions from defrauded customers

White & Case LLP on

In Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC, the Court of Appeal held that the Quincecare duty may apply to direct customer instructions (not just those through an agent), such that banks may be liable for failing to protect against...more

Goodwin

Litigation Insights - July 2021

Goodwin on

FOREWORD - On behalf of the new and expanding Goodwin London litigation team I am delighted to welcome you to our first ever ‘Litigation Insights’: a series of quarterly updates on important and interesting developments...more

Hogan Lovells

"Too good to be true" – Hong Kong court finds bank not liable for fraudulent investment introduced by employee

Hogan Lovells on

The court in Luk Wing Yan v. CMB Wing Lung Bank Ltd. [2021] HKCFI 279 found the defendant not liable for the actions of one of its employees who fraudulently offered investments which caused loss to the plaintiff. ...more

White & Case LLP

The EU loan syndication impact assessment is out: more competition scrutiny ahead?

White & Case LLP on

Setting the scene The long anticipated European Commission (DG COMP) report on "EU loan syndication and its impact on competition in credit markets" (see here) has finally been published. The study primarily focuses on the...more

A&O Shearman

Bank held to higher duty despite no advisory relationship

A&O Shearman on

Even where no advice was given, a bank’s duty of care to its customer was higher than a duty not to misstate facts and extended to explaining the financial implications of certain loans. The decision suggests that, in certain...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending September 4, 2015

Carlton Fields on

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE - Foreclosure/Standing: party whose motion to intervene in foreclosure action was denied did not have standing to appeal final judgment of foreclosure – Market Tampa Investments, LLC. V Stobaugh,...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Eleventh Circuit Rejects Extension of the “No Duty” Rule and Allows D&Os to Pursue State-Law Defenses Based on FDIC Conduct

In a decision announced at the end of 2013 in the case of FDIC v. Steven Skow, et al., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rejected an argument proposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) that...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide