News & Analysis as of

Breach of Contract › Contract Interpretation › Ambiguous

BCLP

Does “Back to Back” Mean “Pay When Paid” in Construction Contracts?

BCLP on

In Sze Fung Engineering Limited v Trevi Construction Company Limited [2025] HKCA 278, the Hong Kong Court of Appeal (“CA”) ruled that the “back to back” wording in that case was not a “pay when paid” clause, but governed only...more

Adams & Reese

South Carolina Ruling Has Major Implications on Indemnity Provisions and Collateral Estoppel

Adams & Reese on

South Carolina contractors need to be aware of a recent decision by the South Carolina Court of Appeals that clarifies the landscape for indemnity provisions in contracts and introduces critical consideration regarding the...more

McGuireWoods LLP

6th Circuit Rules Nonsensical Contract Clause Does Not Equate to Ambiguity

McGuireWoods LLP on

In Hall v. Rag-O-Rama, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit affirmed the decision of a district court that rejected Sally Hall’s breach of contract claims based on a poorly worded contract provision. The 6th...more

Gray Reed

Louisiana Operator’s Bad Faith Does Not Preclude Recovery

Gray Reed on

Under Louisiana law, does the operator’s bad faith preclude recovery for the non-operator’s breach of a joint operating agreement if the operator caused the non-operator to breach the JOA but did not itself breach?...more

Knobbe Martens

Sublicense May Survive Termination of a Main License

Knobbe Martens on

FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT v. SIRIUS XM RADIO INC. Before Dyk, Linn, and Taranto.  Appeal from the District of Delaware. Summary:  Contract interpretation must be applied in determining whether a sublicense survives...more

Gray Reed

NPRI Reservation Survives Rule Against Perpetuities

Gray Reed on

Recall the Battle of the Bastards: The heroic Lady Sansa and the duplicitous Lord Baelish gallop over the hill to save the foolish Jon Snow from the heinous Ramsey Bolton. In similar fashion, but without the malnourished...more

Gray Reed

Option Contract Ruling Reversed by Texas Supreme Court.

Gray Reed on

North Shore Energy v. Harkins interpreted an Option Agreement between landowners and a producer over a 400 acre tract. In football they would say the Texas Supreme Court pancaked the plaintiff. In the law, some would call it...more

Cozen O'Connor

Colorado Supreme Court Limits Use of Extrinsic Evidence and Reasonable Expectations Doctrine

Cozen O'Connor on

On Monday, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hansen, No. 14SC99 (Colo. June 20, 2016), holding that extrinsic evidence can only be used to interpret ambiguous policy language,...more

Carlton Fields

Ambiguities In Reinsurance Broker Agreement Preclude Summary Judgment

Carlton Fields on

A federal district court in Arkansas recently examined provisions of a Broker Authorization Agreement between a reinsurance broker (Global Risk) and a ceding insurer (Aetna). In denying cross-motions for summary judgment on...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide