News & Analysis as of

Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) Customs

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Importers Beware: Can You (Really) Act as Importer of Record?

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

The Canada Border Services Agency’s (“CBSA”) official position is that only the “importer”, the “owner” of the goods, or a licensed customs broker acting on their behalf are authorized to account for commercial goods and be...more

Bennett Jones LLP

The Bri-Chem Trilogy: Federal Court Affirms Tribunal

Bennett Jones LLP on

On November 16, 2015, we described important substantive and procedural issues that would be addressed by the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) in an appeal from a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT)....more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

There’s No Place Like Home: CITT Rules Hotels Are Not Domestic Settings

Whether an imported good is for “domestic” or for “other” purposes is an important distinction for customs because importers of goods “for domestic purposes” must pay customs duties ranging from eight per cent to 9.5 per cent...more

Bennett Jones LLP

The Gap, the Trap and the Binding Spring - The Bri-Chem trilogy, the rule of law and self-corrections of revenue-neutral tariff...

Bennett Jones LLP on

In three decisions released concurrently by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) on September 18, 2015 (collectively referred to as the Bri-Chem trilogy), the CITT instructed the Canada Border Services Agency...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide