News & Analysis as of

Determination on Remand Patent Litigation

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Ericsson Prevails on Appeal in Its Efforts to Invalidate a Frequency Hopping Patent - Intellectual Property News

Appealed PTAB decisions are generally accorded a deferential “substantial evidence” standard by the Federal Circuit. However, this deference did not prevent Ericsson from prevailing in its appeal to the Federal Circuit to...more

Knobbe Martens

The PTAB Reverses Original Decision After the Federal Circuit Reverses Key Findings and Limits Issues for Review

Knobbe Martens on

On October 17, 2017, the PTAB issued a final written decision in an IPR holding all claims unpatentable after the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s previous final written decision. The PTAB reversed their...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Octane Fitness Hits the Showers: Federal Circuit Affirms Attorneys’ Fees Award in Landmark Case

After an eight-year battle through the Federal Courts, the fight over attorneys’ fees in Octane Fitness v. ICON Health & Fitness has likely reached its end with the Federal Circuit upholding the hotly disputed $1.6 million...more

Proskauer - New England IP Blog

Waiver Conundrum in Akamai v. Limelight Remand

In a lengthy litigation between Akamai Technologies, Inc. (“Akamai”) and Limelight Networks, Inc. (“Limelight”), the District of Massachusetts recently addressed whether Limelight waived issues presented in its Renewed Motion...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Despite Amendments during Reexamination, Intervening Rights Not Found - On February 10, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in a case captioned Convolve, Inc., and Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Compaq...more

McDermott Will & Emery

What Happens on Remand of a PTAB Inter Partes Review Decision from the Federal Circuit? - Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc.

McDermott Will & Emery on

In Microsoft Corp., v. Proxyconn, Inc. (IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 7), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recognized that there are limits to the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, and explained, “[t]hat...more

McDermott Will & Emery

De Novo Review Used In Remand in Claim Construction - CardSoft, LLC v. Verifone, Inc.

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing issues of claim construction after a remand from the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit again reversed the district court’s judgment of infringement, finding that it was based on an...more

McDermott Will & Emery

It Ends Not with a Bang but a Whimper - Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

McDermott Will & Emery on

The patent case between Commil and Cisco, a case that made new law at the Supreme Court on the issue of the intent requirement in cases of induced infringement allegations, came to an end with a whimper on remand back to the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

On Remand, Panel Affirms ITC Finding of Section 337 Violation - Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a non-precedential remand decision, the original panel in the case of Suprema v. International Trade Commission affirmed the International Trade Commission’s finding that appellant Suprema violated § 337 by inducing...more

King & Spalding

ITC Section 337 Update – October 2015

King & Spalding on

ITC Proposes Extensive Changes To Rules For Adjudicating Section 337 Investigations – On September 24, 2015, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register announcing proposed changes to its...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide