News & Analysis as of

Dissenting Opinions Appellate Courts

Snell & Wilmer

Ninth Circuit Upholds Oregon's Ban on Unannounced Audio Recordings, Rejects First Amendment Challenge

Snell & Wilmer on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Project Veritas, a conservative activist group that engages in undercover journalism, challenging the constitutionality of an...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Wednesday Returns: Court of Appeals Changes Release Schedule for New Opinions

Fox Rothschild LLP on

You can hit your snooze button a little later on Tuesdays. Effective January 1, 2025, the Court of Appeals’ scheduled filing days for opinions will be the first and third Wednesday of the month, Since the Court will be...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Does a Dissenting Opinion Control the Supreme Court?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

A dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals has long been a litigant’s Golden Ticket, at least until a recent statutory change. The mere existence of the dissent bestowed an automatic right of appeal to the Supreme Court of...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Opinions Galore!

Fox Rothschild LLP on

On May 7, 2024 the North Carolina Court of Appeals issued thirty-three published opinions There’s a lot to chew on here. Here’s my summary of a few of the more interesting or unusual cases. Warren v. Cielo...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

When an appeal becomes moot, should the lower court opinion be vacated?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a short order issued last week, the North Carolina Supreme Court narrowly voted to vacate a Court of Appeals’ opinion in connection with dismissing an appeal on mootness grounds. Well, I said that the order was short, but...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Opinions and Orders and Options: A New Normal?

Fox Rothschild LLP on

When you hear about an appellate decision, what comes to mind? Typically, I think of a formal “opinion”—at least when the appeal has been briefed on the merits. And historically, I have thought of an “order” as a short...more

Cozen O'Connor

Fourth Circuit Adopts Safeco Scienter Standard to Prove False Claims Act Violation in Legal Falsity Cases

Cozen O'Connor on

A few weeks ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit answered a critical inquiry in the False Claims Act (“FCA”) context: does a defendant violate the FCA when it’s reading of the regulation is objectionably...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

A Loch Ness Sighting: A Writ Decision with a Dissent

Fox Rothschild LLP on

There was a time when I thought of a writ of prohibition as a mythical creature that only exists in fairy tales. As it turns out, the writ does exist. And in a decision on the writ that was entered this week, the Court of...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Another Error Preservation Statute

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Under Appellate Rule 10, the general rule is that appellate courts only decide issues properly raised, argued, and decided in the trial tribunal. But exceptions to this general rule exist for issues considered so fundamental...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

The Art Of Persuasion: The Supreme Court Disputes Where To Look

Fox Rothschild LLP on

If there is no binding precedent on point, where does the Supreme Court of North Carolina look for guidance? Which are more persuasive: federal court opinions or North Carolina Court of Appeals opinions? Does the answer to...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

When It Comes To Appeals As Of Right To The Supreme Court Of North Carolina, Not All Dissents Are The Same

Fox Rothschild LLP on

North Carolina General Statute § 7A-30(2) allows for an appeal as of right to the Supreme Court of North Carolina from “any decision of the Court of Appeals rendered in a case…in which there is a dissent.” Seems pretty...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Observations on Cancelled Argument Cases: Appellees Always Win, Right? (Mostly)

Next week is Court week. Readers may remember that, after the Court released the September calendar, we predicted that the submission trend would continue. Were we right? Sort of....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

Know Your En Banc Ninth: Birds of a Feather

Last week, we continued our look at Ninth Circuit en bancs by examining which judges were most and least likely to dissent in the 60 en banc cases submitted and decided since December 2014.*  This week, we look at cases...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

Know Your En Banc Ninth: Who Decides?

Last week, we began our look at the Ninth Circuit en bancs by examining which judges were most and least likely to be selected to en banc panels. This week, we address what these judges decide when selected: who tends to be...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Last week, in Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may consider patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for substitute claims.  The appeal raises issues of finality...more

Haug Partners LLP

Uniloc v. Hulu - Federal Circuit Clash over Scope of PTAB Review of Substitute Claims

Haug Partners LLP on

WHAT DO WE KNOW? 1. On July 22, 2020, a sharply split Federal Circuit panel held that “[t]he PTAB correctly concluded that it is not limited by § 311(b) in its review of proposed substitute claims in an IPR, and that it...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide