News & Analysis as of

Duty to Settle Policy Terms

Wiley Rein LLP

Capacity Exclusion Bars Coverage for Settlement Involving Director’s Self-Dealing While Acting in Dual Capacity as Shareholder and...

Wiley Rein LLP on

A New Jersey appellate court, applying New Jersey law, has held that the capacity exclusion in a directors and officers policy precluded coverage for a settlement of lawsuits alleging that an insured director defrauded a...more

Payne & Fears

California Court of Appeal Issues Important Opinion on Bad Faith Failure to Settle

Payne & Fears on

The California Court of Appeal issued an important decision that may significantly impact how settlement opportunities are evaluated in catastrophic liability claims.  In Pinto v. Farmers Ins. Exch., No. B295742, ___ Cal....more

Wiley Rein LLP

Malpractice Insurer Not Liable for Bad Faith for Rejecting Settlement Demand Within Limits

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, applying Texas law, has held that a legal malpractice insurer was not liable for a statutory bad faith claim by the insured law firm because the evidence...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

“That Settles It”: The Georgia Supreme Court Provides Clarity Regarding an Insurer’s Duty to Settle

Robins Kaplan LLP on

NEW GUIDANCE FROM THE GEORGIA SUPREME COURT RE: AN INSURER’S DUTY TO SETTLE - The issue of whether an insurer has fulfilled its duty to settle in good faith was recently litigated in Georgia. Under Georgia law “[a]n...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide