News & Analysis as of

Eminent Domain Takings Clause

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Understanding Attorney’s Fees and Costs Reimbursement in North Carolina Land Condemnation Cases

Cranfill Sumner LLP on

It is one of the most common assumptions made by clients in litigation: “If I win, the other side will have to pay my attorney’s fees, right?” Unfortunately, that assumption is often wrong—especially in North Carolina. The...more

Nossaman LLP

Inverse Condemnation Liability Does Not Extend to Failure to Prevent Actions of Another Party

Nossaman LLP on

Can a public entity be held liable for inverse condemnation when it fails to prevent another party from causing damage to private property?  This one is pretty simple:  the answer is no....more

Snell & Wilmer

Tenth Circuit Revives Takings Claims for Public Use of Property Held Under the State’s Unclaimed Property Act

Snell & Wilmer on

In a decision that may reshape how states administer their unclaimed property statutes, the Tenth Circuit held that property owners can pursue takings claims against the Colorado State Treasurer (Treasurer) without exhausting...more

Winstead PC

Come & Take It: The Eminent Domain Podcast (Episode #13), Featuring Winstead Shareholder Tom Forestier

Winstead PC on

Tune in to the latest episode of "Come and Take It: The Eminent Domain Podcast." Host Bobby Debelak sits down with Winstead Shareholder Thomas J. Forestier, a leading infrastructure and eminent domain attorney with 37+ years...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Defines When Property Owner in Eminent Domain Case Can Pursue Appeal

Roetzel & Andress on

For the past several years, the hot topic in Ohio eminent domain law has been the ability of a property owner to challenge a taking based on whether it is necessary for a public purpose, or if the appropriating authority...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rules in Favor of Landowners in Eminent Domain Claim

On August 20, 2024, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued a ruling in Wolfe v. Reading Blue Mountain & Northern RR Co. The Court overturned the Commonwealth Court’s determination that a condemnation of private land by a...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Rules Property Owner Can Recover Attorney Fees When Eminent Domain Case Is Dismissed by the Taking Authority

Roetzel & Andress on

In the case of N. Ridgeville v. Zilka, 9th Dist. Lorain No. 23CA012047, 2024-Ohio-2468, Ohio’s Ninth District Court of Appeals addressed the ability of a property owner in an eminent domain action to recover attorney fees...more

Roetzel & Andress

Substitute Version of Bill in Ohio House That Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law Recently Accepted by Committee

Roetzel & Andress on

Update - February 2024: We have been following the progress of House Bill (“HB”) 64 in Ohio’s 135th General Assembly (formerly HB 698 in the 134th General Assembly) (the “Bill”), which proposes numerous changes to Ohio’s...more

Nossaman LLP

Right of Way 101

Nossaman LLP on

This past week I had the opportunity to attend the International Right of Way Association’s (IRWA) Region 1 Fall Forum and Symposium in San Diego, California. On Friday, Brad Kuhn and I presented an update on recent federal...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Fish(es), Minerals, Train Tracks and Parks (and the law of Constructive Taking)

Bennett Jones LLP on

The Law of Taking was Fishy - If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime. But what if a man has the right to sell fish, and he builds his business...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

When the Rubber Doesn’t Meet the Road: Ohio Supreme Court Sends Eminent Domain Dispute over Park Bike Path Back to Trial Court

Bricker Graydon LLP on

The construction of a bike path ran into a bump in the road when the Mill Creek Metropolitan Park District (Park District) attempted to take land through eminent domain. The Park District is a public entity that is attempting...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Surplus Funds from Tax Sales are a Property Interest

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On May 25, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a Minnesota county’s retention of the excess proceeds from sale of a homeowner’s property to satisfy a tax lien violated the Takings Clause. This decision recognizes that...more

Nossaman LLP

Supreme Court Rules County Can’t Keep the Change

Nossaman LLP on

Local governments—generally counties—impose property taxes on real estate pursuant to state law. Sometimes called ad valorem taxes, these property taxes are set based on the assessed value of the property. When a landowner...more

Roetzel & Andress

2022 Bill in Ohio House That Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law Reintroduced in 2023

Roetzel & Andress on

Update: We previously published the alert below regarding House Bill (“HB”) 698 in the 134th Ohio General Assembly, which proposed numerous changes to Ohio’s eminent domain statutes that would be favorable to property owners,...more

Nossaman LLP

Calculating Condemnation Interest Rates – California & Nevada

Nossaman LLP on

The payment of “just compensation” for the taking of private property includes more than merely writing a check to the property owner after a jury determines the current fair market value of the taking. A property owner is...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Eminent Domain: Supreme Court Opens Door for Agencies to Pay Less Compensation Through “Appraisal Shopping”

Roetzel & Andress on

Under Ohio Revised Code 163.04, a condemning authority is required to make a good faith offer to purchase property it seeks to acquire at least 30 days before it may file an eminent domain lawsuit to take the property. If it...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: Abstention and the Golden Globes

This week, the Court addresses the application of abstention doctrine to federal takings litigation and whether the Hollywood Foreign Press Association’s membership policies violate antitrust law. The Court holds that...more

Nossaman LLP

City Imposed Penalty of One-Year Building Moratorium Does Not Constitute a Taking

Nossaman LLP on

Local government agencies sometimes enact short-term building moratoriums for certain areas to further assess changes in land use patterns or slow growth. Those moratoriums imposed across a large area usually do not...more

Nossaman LLP

Summary of Major Eminent Domain Cases & Legislation: January 1, 2022 - May 31, 2022

Nossaman LLP on

Facts: The property owner alleged a per se taking and inverse condemnation in the expansion of a road that increased surface and stormwater runoff flowing under the property and ultimately a sinkhole in the parking lot. The...more

Nossaman LLP

Ch-Ch-Changes in the Law: Eminent Domain and Infrastructure Update

Nossaman LLP on

Earlier this month, we gave a presentation during the International Right of Way Association’s 68th Annual Education Conference in Cleveland, Ohio. In keeping with the “rock and roll” theme, our session, “Ch-Ch-Changes in the...more

Stark & Stark

Infrastructure Spending's Impact On Franchise Sites

Stark & Stark on

Over the next five years, the federal government expects to spend over a trillion dollars on a wide range of infrastructure projects, including road widenings, bridge repairs, and upgrading mass transit and the power grid (to...more

Roetzel & Andress

New Bill in Ohio House Could Dramatically Change Eminent Domain Law

Roetzel & Andress on

On June 7, 2022, House Bill 698 was introduced in the Ohio House of Representatives. The Bill would amend Ohio’s eminent domain law, Ohio Revised Code Chapter 163, in numerous ways that are favorable to property owners and...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

A Roadmap to Illinois Eminent Domain Cases

For property owners, the process of eminent domain — the legal proceeding through which the government can acquire private property for a public purpose — can be a long and intimidating journey. Once an owner becomes aware...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

What To Do When Facing a Government Taking: A Colorado Eminent Domain FAQ

You received a Notice of Intent from the government or private company seeking to take your property. You probably have a lot of questions. Read on for answers to common questions and tips on how to protect your rights during...more

Smith Anderson

Fourth Circuit Rejects Federal Jurisdiction Over Claim Against State for Loss of Private Property

Smith Anderson on

A recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concerned a nightmare scenario for any property owner. The plaintiffs sought to rebuild their beachfront house after it was destroyed. Originally...more

195 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide