News & Analysis as of

Error At Law

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

United States Supreme Court Clarifies Boundaries of Federal Civil Rule 60(b)

Getting a trial court to rethink its prior decision is a steep climb. The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Kemp v. United States, issued June 13, 2022, makes achieving such outcomes easier in one sense, but more...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Kemp v. United States

On June 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Kemp v. United States, No. 21-5726, holding that the term “mistake” in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) includes a judge’s errors of law, and therefore Petitioner...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses Apotex’s appeal of $61M profits award to Servier/ADIR for infringement of perindopril patent

Smart & Biggar on

On March 11, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of the Federal Court’s decision ordering Apotex to pay over $61M from an accounting of profits from Apotex’s infringement of ADIR’s perindopril patent...more

Carlton Fields

To Move for Rehearing or Not to Move for Rehearing: That Is the Question

Carlton Fields on

In almost every situation, a party would prefer to defend a favorable judgment on appeal rather than fight to reverse a negative judgment. And when we are forced to be the appellant, we want the error in the challenged...more

Carlton Fields

Unforced Errors: Don't Leave a Ground of the Court's Ruling Unchallenged

Carlton Fields on

We have previously explained the importance of appealing every aspect of a trial court's order granted on multiple, independent grounds. The Eleventh Circuit recently reminded us of that, but also that in opposing motions at...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Post-Verdict Motion for Increased Damages Ends on a Sour Note

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing a trademark owner’s Rule 59(e) motion to amend the jury’s damage award, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the trademark owner was not entitled to an increased damages award after discovering...more

Jones Day

The End of the "Deemed Liability" Adjudication in Western Australia

Jones Day on

The Problem: The Construction Contracts Act 2004 (WA) contains a number of provisions that are to be implied into construction contracts that are silent as to those matters. These implied terms have been a steady source of...more

Jones Day

Australia: Adjudicators’ Security of Payment Determinations Not Reviewable for Errors of Law

Jones Day on

The Situation: The High Court of Australia has, for the first time, confirmed that determinations by adjudicators appointed under security of payment legislation are not reviewable for errors of law alone. The Result: The...more

Jones Day

Projects Disputes in Australia: Recent Cases

Jones Day on

Since late last year, there have been several major decisions from Australia's highest courts on important issues for stakeholders in the construction, mining and infrastructure industries. Below, we provide a summary. Some...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide