News & Analysis as of

Evidence Medical Malpractice

Marshall Dennehey

Legal Roundup - Pennsylvania

Marshall Dennehey on

Pennsylvania Superior Court holds that trial court correctly entered nonsuit on plaintiff’s corporate negligence claim for failing to show actual or constructive knowledge....more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Expert Competency Rule Change Reverses Effects of Johnson v. Abdullah

Bricker Graydon LLP on

To succeed in meeting their evidentiary burden for a medical malpractice claim, a plaintiff must prove a breach of the standard of care, causation, and damages through expert testimony. See Bruni v. Tatsumi, 46 Ohio St.2d...more

K&L Gates LLP

NSW Supreme Court Considers Inherent Risk and Peer Professional Opinion in Bariatric Surgery Case Polsen v Harrison (No. 8)

K&L Gates LLP on

On 6 July 2023, Lonergan J found in favour of Dr Harrison (Defendant), in a complex bariatric surgery case brought by Katrina Polsen (Plaintiff). A full decision can be read here. BACKGROUND - On 22 July 2013, the Plaintiff...more

Nossaman LLP

California’s New Apology Law and Its Impact on Peer Review Hearings

Nossaman LLP on

Parties in peer review hearings can present a wide range of relevant evidence, regardless of its admissibility in a court of law.  But California has passed a new “apology law” that modifies that standard, erecting a...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

Cross-Examination About Medical Condition Without Formal Diagnosis Deemed Error: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois Medical...

Is evidence of syphilis sufficient to allow cross-examination of a treating physician relating to pain associated with that condition? Lugarda Castillo and Richard Castillo v. The Center for Athletic Medicine, et al., 2019...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

$50M Jury Verdict Overturned on Appeal Because Evidence of Autism Excluded at Trial: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois...

Did a trial court err in excluding evidence of subsequent formal diagnosis of autism when potentially alternative cause of current condition of minor? Julien Florez v. Northshore University Healthsystem d/b/a Evanston...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

Defendant Physician can be Cross-Examined With His Disclosure and ACR Guidelines: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois Medical...

Can the trial court properly bar plaintiff from introducing defendant radiologist's Rule 213(f)(iii) disclosure as an admission against interest, or questioning him about the American College of Radiology (ACR) practice...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

Res Ipsa Loquitur in Practice: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois Medical Malpractice Litigation: 2020 Edition

Was a trial court's order barring all evidence related to plaintiff's res ipsa loquitur claim was improper? Alma Willis v. Sisters of St. Francis Health Services, Inc., d/b/a St. James Hospital and Health Centers, et al.,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Proving Consent Was Not Informed Is Not So Easy For Medical Malpractice Plaintiffs

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Last week, the Court of Appeals reinforced the importance of the statutory presumption that a doctor has obtained valid informed consent. The Hauser v. Brookview Women’s Center court affirmed the trial court’s instruction on...more

Sands Anderson PC

Affirmed: Think Twice Before Retaining An Expert Who Has Been Subject To Disciplinary Proceedings

Sands Anderson PC on

If you decide to retain an expert with a past disciplinary history, be prepared for that information to be used at trial to attack your expert’s credibility! In Gross v. Stuart the Supreme Court of Virginia held that it was...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Fifth DCA Reaffirms Protections Against Surprise Tactics at Trial

Rumberger | Kirk on

This past January, Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal found that a trial court had committed reversible error by allowing a party to argue and present previously undisclosed expert testimony and evidence to the jury at...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Medical Litigation Newsletter - October 2016

When a Defensible Claim Goes Sour: Defending Spoliation of Evidence Claims - Let us assume you have a credible defense to the negligence allegations as to the care and treatment provided by a doctor, hospital, medical...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Appellate Court Advance Release Opinions: AC37588 - Prime Locations of CT, LLC v. Rocky Hill Development, LLC - When a commercial condominium unit owner’s association refused to grant their approval for a...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions: SC19203 - Tilcon Connecticut, Inc. v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection - Applicant sought a water diversion permit for some of its quarries for water used in its rock...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Defending Against Non-Retained Experts

California is generally regarded as providing broad leeway for non-retained experts to testify on a range of matters. Several recent decisions, however, have narrowed the scope of permissible testimony for non-retained...more

15 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide