News & Analysis as of

Excessive Force Supreme Court of the United States Qualified Immunity

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Rejects "Moment-of-Threat" Rule in Section 1983 Excessive Force Suit

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In Barnes v. Felix, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that courts evaluating Fourth Amendment excessive-force claims in Section 1983 lawsuits against law enforcement officers must consider the “totality of the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Justices Reject “Moment of Threat” Rule in Police Shooting Case - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

The most anticipated event at the U.S. Supreme Court today was the oral argument in the birthright citizenship case....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - May 15, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision today: Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239: This criminal procedure case concerns the proper scope of analysis for Fourth Amendment excessive force claims....more

Baker Donelson

A Victory for Qualified Immunity. A Trend to Continue?

Baker Donelson on

Events from recent years related to alleged police misconduct raised major questions surrounding the protections afforded by qualified immunity to police officers in excessive force claims. Two recent Supreme Court decisions...more

Rumberger | Kirk

United States Supreme Court Affirms Officers’ Entitlement to Qualified Immunity

Rumberger | Kirk on

Law enforcement critics have launched concerted attacks on the doctrine of qualified immunity in an effort to mischaracterize the doctrine as allowing police officers to escape liability for clearly unconstitutional conduct. ...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Lombardo v. St. Louis

On June 28, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lombardo v. St. Louis, 20-391, holding per curium that excessive force precedent requires courts to employ a “careful, context-specific analysis” on summary judgment. In...more

Poyner Spruill LLP

Torres v. Madrid (New Excessive Force Opinion from SCOTUS)

Poyner Spruill LLP on

In a 5-3 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Torres v. Madrid that a woman who was shot while fleeing from police officers was “seized,” even though she remained at large. ...more

Poyner Spruill LLP

US Supreme Court Holds Police Officer Shooting was Lawful

Poyner Spruill LLP on

The US Supreme Court issued an Opinion April 2, 2018 (Kisela v. Hughes) that a Tucson Police officer was justified in shooting a woman who was holding a knife near her roommate after the woman was reported exhibiting...more

Sands Anderson PC

Supreme Court: Police Had "Qualified Immunity" in Shooting Woman With Knife

Sands Anderson PC on

The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that a Tucson police officer who shot a woman four times could not be sued for violating the woman’s Constitutional rights. The case is a significant win for government officials. It’s a...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - April 2, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions today: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, No. 16-1362: The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) requires that employers pay covered employees overtime compensation,...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide