News & Analysis as of

Failure To Warn Liability

Goldberg Segalla

Jury Returns Verdict for American Honda in Asbestos Brakes Case

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co. - Plaintiff Jose Estrada filed suit alleging exposure to asbestos from a variety of products, including automobile parts during his employment at a tire store. Mr. Estrada was...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Product Liability Update - February 2025

Foley Hoag LLP on

Foley Hoag LLP publishes this quarterly Update primarily concerning developments in product liability and related law from federal and state courts applicable to Massachusetts, but also featuring selected developments for New...more

Morris James LLP

Meningioma and Birth Control Lawsuits: The Case Against Depo-Provera

Morris James LLP on

Women across the country are taking legal action against Pfizer, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, alleging that the company failed to warn about the risks of developing meningiomas — generally non-cancerous but potentially...more

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

Rhode Island’s First Asbestos Verdict in Nearly 40 Years

For the first time in nearly 40 years, an asbestos case was tried to verdict in Rhode Island. This case, The Estate of Bonnie Bonito, resulted in a full defense verdict!...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Connecticut Court Awards Punitive Damages in Recent Asbestos Trial

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Estate of Nicholas Barone trial in Bridgeport Superior Court in Connecticut before Judge William Clark concluded with a $15 million plaintiff’s verdict on 5/16/2024. The jury also awarded punitive damages, the exact...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Maritime Products Liability Law: Understanding the Fundamentals

McGlinchey Stafford on

The United States Supreme Court first recognized products liability, including strict liability, as part of the general maritime law in East River Steamship S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858 (1986). The...more

Stikeman Elliott LLP

Ontario Court Dismisses Failure to Warn and Negligent Manufacture Claims Against Defendants in Leaky Dishwasher Case

Stikeman Elliott LLP on

In Pelton v Maytag, 2024 ONSC 3016 (“Pelton”) the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) ruled that the defendant manufacturers were not liable for failing to warn consumers that the product could fail because of a...more

Conn Kavanaugh

Massachusetts Appeals Court Expands Chapter 93A to Encompass Hotel’s Failure to Warn Guest of Non-Solicitation Policy

Conn Kavanaugh on

With each decision, the courts give shape to Chapter 93A. This is Attorney Thayer’s second article on such decisions. To read his July 2023 coverage, click here. In a surprising decision that heightens potential exposure...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Federal Court Tosses Fifteen-Year-Old Lead Paint Personal Injury Lawsuit

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On March 2, 2022, a Wisconsin federal judge dismissed Burton v. Am. Cyanamid Co., No. 07-C-0303, 2022 WL 623895 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 2, 2022), a lingering fifteen-year personal injury litigation against lead-based paint...more

Butler Snow LLP

20 Questions to Ask When Defending a Medical Device Case

Butler Snow LLP on

In the game of “20 Questions,” one player secretly chooses an object and the other players are allowed 20 questions to identify it. In that spirit, answering the following 20 questions may identify a defense strategy that...more

Butler Snow LLP

The Learned Intermediary Doctrine: Debunking Myths

Butler Snow LLP on

The learned intermediary doctrine is not sexy. Its application doesn’t require depositions or a jury trial. Look no further than its name:  it’s a legal doctrine. Nevertheless, drug and device manufacturers still face a...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide