News & Analysis as of

Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Federal Rule 12(b)(1)

Womble Bond Dickinson

For Cannabis Dispensaries, Ounce of Prevention Worth More than Pound of Cure

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Imagine facing the prospect of a crippling class action lawsuit and having to engage in costly discovery to disprove the claims, even where clear evidence of innocence is presented at the pleading stage. For one cannabis...more

Troutman Pepper

False Claims Act Update: Third Circuit Widens First-to-File Circuit Split

Troutman Pepper on

Last week, in the In re Plavix decision, the Third Circuit addressed the question of whether relators can be added or substituted in an amended complaint and, in the process, weighed in on whether the first-to-file bar is...more

WilmerHale

A Guide To West Texas Patent Cases Before Albright: Part 2

WilmerHale on

Our earlier Law360 guest article highlighted the rapid rise in prominence of the Waco Division of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas since U.S. District Judge Alan Albright was appointed to that court...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

ERISA-Exempt Governmental Plan Withstands Putative Class Action Challenge

Late last year, we wrote about Shore v. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, et al., in which former Atrium Health employees filed a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North...more

Mintz - Arbitration, Mediation, ADR...

Incorporation by Reference of a Commercial Contract’s Arbitration Clause Can Bind a Non-Signatory Performance Bond Surety

Heads up, sureties! (And all other contracting parties.) Incorporation by reference of the terms of one agreement into another is a classical common law basis for binding the incorporating parties to the incorporated terms....more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Federal Court “Discards” DOJ Interpretation Of Wire Act

In a closely watched case, a New Hampshire federal court has ruled that the Wire Act is limited to sports betting and set aside the DOJ’s recent opinion to the contrary. However, it limited the scope of its declaratory relief...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Injury-in-Fact vs. Actual Damages — Avoiding a Jurisdictional Sideshow in Data Breach Class Actions by Challenging Damages, Not...

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo v. Robins, which held that federal plaintiffs alleging a statutory violation must have suffered a real, concrete injury in order to have Article III standing, many defendants...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Federal Court Cites Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and New Jersey “Entire Controversy Doctrine” to Decline Jurisdiction of FCRA Claims

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) in Gunter-King v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 18-11316 (JBS/JS), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209443 (D.N.J. Dec. 12, 2018), defaulted on their loan obligation on or about July 2012 and a...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Getting Technical: Court finds that disclosures mandated under FCRA must meet the precise requirements of the Act

Womble Bond Dickinson on

“Technically speaking, your claim is not good enough.” That was the message that the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey delivered to the Plaintiff in Tonge v. Cpc Logistics, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Seventh Circuit Reinstates Barnes & Noble Data Breach Class Action

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has reinstated a data breach class action filed against Barnes & Noble (B&N).  The litigation, styled as Dieffenbach v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., now heads back to the U.S....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Whistleblower’s Claim Survives Dismissal and Death

The Energizer Bunny has nothing on the whistleblower claim of Robert Cunningham. Here’s what’s happened since Robert files his qui tam action against Millennium Labs back in 2009: the government declined to intervene; seven...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Ferring B.V. v. Actavis, Inc., Civil No. 15-4222 (SRC)(CLW), 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69328 (D.N.J. May 26, 2016) (Chesler, J.) - Drug Product and Patents-in-Suit: Lysteda® (tranexamic acid); U.S. Patent No....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

If At First You Don’t Succeed, Plead, Plead Again…

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In Wynn, et al. v. The New York City Housing Authority 14 Civ. 2818 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2015), several employees (who were either African-American or Hispanic) alleged that their employer, the New York City Housing Authority...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide