News & Analysis as of

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure › Discovery › Motion for Sanctions

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model

No Sanctions for Resetting Two Cellphones on Facts Presented; and, Social Media Posts Supported Dismissal

EDRM - Electronic Discovery Reference Model on

In Wenzler v. U.S. Coast Guard, 2025 WL 1445805 (Mar. 20, 2025), Wenzler alleged that he had been disenrolled from the voluntary U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary based on his speech on social media.  Wenzler unsuccessfully asserted...more

Minerva26

Ready to File a Motion for Sanctions? Make Sure You Tell the Court.

Minerva26 on

Filing a motion for sanctions under Rule 37(e) requires a strong evidentiary foundation. But there's another factor that's just as critical — timing. Courts have broad discretion in how they handle sanctions, and...more

Snell & Wilmer

The Apex Rule and Protecting Your Client’s Management Team When Conducting Deposition Discovery

Snell & Wilmer on

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure liberally enable parties to seek relevant information in discovery that may be helpful in the preparation and trial of a case. While the liberal scope of discovery permitted by the...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

New Best Practices Under E-Discovery Spoliation Rule

Troutman Pepper Locke on

As the volume of electronically stored information, or ESI, subject to discovery has exploded, allegations of spoliation have multiplied. Before the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, courts relied on...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide