News & Analysis as of

Filing Requirements Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

Troutman Pepper

The Obligation to Submit Agreements in IPRs Is Broad

Troutman Pepper on

DTN, LLC v. Farms Technology, LLC, IPR2018-01412, -01525 (June 14, 2019) - On June 11, 2020, the PTAB designated as precedential its 2019 decision in DTN, LLC v. Farms Technology, LLC. The decision concerns the scope of...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

PTAB Strategies and Insights - January 2019: Unreviewed Filing Date Notice Dooms Petition

Petitioners beware. Your Notice of Filing date needs to be reviewed immediately – and not just the notice email, because the email does not alert petitioner to defects in filing....more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

PTAB Denies Motion to Excuse Late Filing of Exhibits to IPR Petition

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has denied a petitioner’s motion to excuse the late filing of the exhibits to its petition for inter partes review (IPR). The PTAB found that the petitioner had failed to show good...more

Jones Day

Delayed Payment Proves Fatal for Cultec’s PTAB Challenge

Jones Day on

Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), a petition for inter partes review (IPR) may not be filed more than one year after the date on which the petitioner was served with a patent infringement complaint. Thus, a petition must meet all of...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide