News & Analysis as of

Franchise Agreements Development Agreements

Lathrop GPM

Oregon Federal Court Holds Nonsignatory Owners Are Not Subject to Arbitration Provision

Lathrop GPM on

In a case involving an unorthodox procedural posture, a federal court in Oregon determined that nonsignatory franchisee owners are not subject to a franchise agreement arbitration provision. Goergen v. Black Rock Coffee B.,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Meet the New Boss

Lewitt Hackman on

A Tim Hortons franchisee sued the franchisor for breach of six franchise agreements and an area development agreement. Tim Hortons counterclaimed for breach of contract based on failure by the franchisee to meet the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Tax on Renewals

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Virginia denied tax franchisor, Liberty Tax’s, motion to dismiss complaints by two of its area developers (“ADs”). The ADs claimed Liberty Tax breached their contract for wrongfully terminating, failing to...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: No Shaking Franchisor’s TRO

Lewitt Hackman on

An Indiana federal court granted hamburger and milkshake franchisor, Steak n Shake, a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against a franchisee to enforce post-termination obligations under franchise and area development...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Strong Releases Protect Fitness Franchisor

Lewitt Hackman on

A franchisee sued its franchisor, OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC, in Texas federal court after OsteoStrong terminated the franchise and development agreements. Termination occurred after the franchisee failed to timely develop...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide