News & Analysis as of

FRCP 45 Third-Party

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

FRCP 45 Does Not Apply to the Court’s Lit-Funding Orders That Were Reasonable and Within the Court’s Inherent Authority

5 On July 16, 2024, the Federal Circuit affirmed both the sua sponte order issued by the District of Delaware requiring Lori LaPray, the purported owner of all of the plaintiff LLCs created by the patent monetization firm, IP...more

Kilpatrick

Shifting Costs for Responding to Subpoenas Under FRCP 45

Kilpatrick on

Subpoenas provide a necessary discovery tool for parties to obtain relevant and many times critical information for litigation, but they often burden uninvolved third parties with the hassle and distraction of investigating...more

Butler Snow LLP

Wait, Why Am I Receiving This? Practice Pointers on Third Party Responses to Litigation Preservation Demands

Butler Snow LLP on

Most commercial litigators are familiar with the process for responding to a subpoena demanding the production of documents from a non-party to litigation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. But interesting...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

The E-Discovery Digest - March 2018

The ninth edition of The E-Discovery Digest focuses on recent decisions addressing the scope and application of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine, spoliation, and discovery responses....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide