News & Analysis as of

Federal Trade Commission (FTC) › Department of Justice (DOJ) › Motion to Dismiss

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Developments in Association Law 2022 – 2024

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The following is a review of notable cases and regulatory developments for nonprofit organizations at the federal and state levels during the last two years....more

Stevens & Lee

District Court Dismisses Welsh Carson While Allowing the FTC to Proceed Against U.S. Anesthesia Partners

Stevens & Lee on

In a prior post, we discussed the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) lawsuit against U.S. Anesthesia Partners (“USAP”) and the private equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (“Welsh Carson”). Most recently, the U.S....more

Polsinelli

Regeneron v Novartis and Vetter: Walker Process Client Update

Polsinelli on

In an appeal that attracted a dozen amici, including the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, five states, and the District of Columbia, the Second Circuit gave the Walker Process antitrust doctrine a shot in...more

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

DOJ Loses Two Criminal Antitrust Labor Trials, Stymied by (Lack of) Evidence

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints on

The closely watched government campaign to criminally prosecute labor-related antitrust matters has run into a major roadblock—juries. Last week, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) was...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

FTC's Drop Of Illumina-Grail Merger Case Raises Uncertainty

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

A federal judge recently dismissed the Federal Trade Commission's challenge of Illumina Inc.'s acquisition of Grail Inc., a cancer-screening firm started and spun off years earlier by Illumina itself. A victory for the...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

As Treatment of No-Poach Agreements Evolves, DOJ To Examine Antitrust in Labor Markets

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Antitrust treatment of no-poach agreements continues to evolve as private cases progress, state attorneys general ramp up enforcement efforts and federal regulators further contemplate the legality of no-poach agreements....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

'Titans' of Antitrust Policy Clash Over No-Poach Agreements

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Legal battles over the antitrust treatment of no-poach agreements continue to escalate with new district court decisions and new pronouncements from two “titans” of antitrust policy, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

A Fresh Approach to No-Poach Provisions in Franchise Agreements

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

• The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have indicated in the past that they believe that certain agreements between employers not to poach each other’s employees are...more

BakerHostetler

Update: Section 1 Challenge to Jimmy John’s No-Poach Agreement Survives Motion to Dismiss

BakerHostetler on

We recently wrote that the Department of Justice’s and the Federal Trade Commission’s announcements condemning no-poaching agreements have sparked civil class actions, including a putative class action against Jimmy John’s....more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

DOJ & FTC Join Telemedicine Attack on Texas Medical Board

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

The U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission have sided with Teledoc, Inc., one of the country’s biggest telemedicine companies, in its legal battle with the Texas Medical Board. The two agencies filed a joint...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide