News & Analysis as of

Generic Drugs › Food and Drug Administration (FDA) › CAFC

Hogan Lovells

Federal Circuit affirms GSK labeling carve-out ruling in favor of innovator

Hogan Lovells on

Earlier this month, in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed (2-1) upon rehearing its October 2020 decision that a labeling...more

Hogan Lovells

Labeling carve-out does not shield generic drug makers from induced infringement claims, CAFC rules

Hogan Lovells on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently decided (2-1) in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. that a labeling carve-out by a generic drug sponsor did not preclude a finding of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Can FDA Implement The BPCIA As The CAFC Suggested?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Amgen v. Apotex, the Federal Circuit held that under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”), “an applicant must provide a reference product sponsor with 180 days’ post-licensure notice before...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide