News & Analysis as of

Gunn v Minton Walker Process Claims

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Return to Sender: When Courts of Appeals Disagree on Which One Has Jurisdiction

What happens when two courts of appeal each think the other has exclusive jurisdiction over an appeal? Confusion and inter-circuit criticism. The latest chapter in such a dispute between the Federal and Fifth Circuits on the...more

Haug Partners LLP

Federal Circuit Clarifies the Scope of Its Jurisdiction Over Walker Process Antitrust Claims in Chandler. v. Phoenix Services LLC

Haug Partners LLP on

On June 10, 2021, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential order in Chandler v. Phx. Servs. LLC, No. 2020-1848 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2021) that clarified the scope of its jurisdiction over Walker Process1 claims of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Rejects Appeal of Walker Process Claim

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Xitronix Corp. v. KLA-Tencor Corp., No. 2016-2746 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2018), the Federal Circuit considered whether it or a regional circuit had jurisdiction over an appeal of a case raising only Walker Process antitrust...more

Knobbe Martens

Xitronix Corporation v. Kla-Tencor Corporation

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Mayer, and Hughes. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Summary: The Federal Circuit...more

McDermott Will & Emery

THE LATEST: Walker Process Claims Don’t Belong in the Federal Circuit

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Federal Circuit held Walker Process Claims without a “substantial” patent issue can be heard outside the Federal Circuit based on the US Supreme Court decision in Gunn v. Minton....more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide