News & Analysis as of

Health Insurance › Employee Benefits › Defined Benefit Plans

Groom Law Group, Chartered

IRS Rules That Payment of 401(h) Account Benefits to Pension-Eligible Active Participants Won’t Jeopardize Plan Qualification

Groom Law Group, Chartered on

A recent IRS letter ruling provides helpful clarification on the interaction of in-service distributions to active employees (Code section 401(a)(36)) and the requirement that Code section 401(h) accounts provide only retiree...more

Morgan Lewis

CARES Act Brings Compensation, Benefits, and Payroll Tax Changes

Morgan Lewis on

With broad bipartisan support, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act or Act), signed into law by the president on March 27, provides a $2 trillion economic stimulus and contains numerous and...more

Foley Hoag LLP

COVID-19 Considerations for Certain Compensation and Employee Benefit Arrangements

Foley Hoag LLP on

As the economic repercussion of the COVID-19 pandemic is becoming increasingly severe, employers should consider its potential impact on the design and administration of various compensation and employee benefit arrangements....more

Proskauer Rose LLP

The ERISA Litigation Newsletter - August 2016

Proskauer Rose LLP on

Editor's Overview - This month’s newsletter features an article on the DOL’s recently published interim final rule that increases penalties for notice and disclosure violations, which generally became effective on...more

Franczek P.C.

Employee Benefits Alert - July 2015

Franczek P.C. on

Major Revisions to Qualified Plan Determination Letter Process Announced - Effective January 1, 2017, the staggered five-year determination letter remedial amendment cycles for individually designed plans will be...more

Snell & Wilmer

When Did You Last Amend Your Section 125 Cafeteria or Flexible Benefit Plan? Now May Be A Good Time to Dust It Off and Update It

Snell & Wilmer on

Section 125 Plans, which are commonly referred to as either cafeteria plans or flexible benefit plans, are much loved, and needed, if you want to allow employees to pay health insurance and other premiums on a pre-tax basis....more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Rules DOMA Unconstitutional – Employee Benefit Plan Implications

Troutman Pepper on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court, in U.S. v. Windsor, ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional because it violates the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection guaranty for persons of the same...more

Winstead PC

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling: Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA")

Winstead PC on

While the U.S. Supreme Court(the “Court”) ruled section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) unconstitutional, that does not mean that the changes for human resources departments and employee benefits plans can be...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide