News & Analysis as of

Hearsay › Expert Testimony

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defense Expert’s Hearsay Statements Granted

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; July 18, 2022 - Plaintiffs filed an asbestos-related lawsuit on behalf of Decedent, Callan Cortez, alleging that Mr. Cortez contracted mesothelioma as a...more

Morgan Lewis

PTAB Emphasizes Expert Availability and Clarifies Fintiv Inquiry for Prior District Court Cases

Morgan Lewis on

The US Patent Trial and Appeal Board on December 23, 2021, instituted an inter partes review even though an unrelated party had already unsuccessfully challenged the validity of the patent in district court. In the decision...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Even At A Default Hearing, An Expert Report Is Inadmissable Hearsay If The Expert Doesn’t Testify

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Very often, uncertified expert reports are attached to certifications and courts are asked to accept them though there is no ability to cross examine the expert, etc. Sometimes, that even happens at a default or other...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

CVC Files Motion to Exclude Broad Evidence; Broad Opposes

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The latest installment in the cat-and-mouse game of deciding priority in Interference No 106,155 between Senior Party The Broad Institute, Harvard University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (collectively,...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

Your Hearsay Objection to Expert Testimony in Support of an Award for Future Damages: Use it or Lose it

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP on

In David v. Hernandez, 2017 No. B270133, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, upheld the trial court’s evidentiary rulings on two distinct expert opinions: (1) speculative testimony regarding plaintiff’s marijuana...more

WilmerHale

How the PTAB Treats Pre-Institution Factual Disputes

WilmerHale on

As a result of recent changes in the PTAB rules of practice, counsel for patent owners should consider whether there are opportunities to identify factual deficiencies in petitions. Counsel for petitioners in inter partes...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions: SC19359 - Persels & Associates, LLC v. Banking Commissioner - Noting that it has generally been the policy of the Courts to defer to the Legislature, especially as to the...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Court Notes

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

Supreme Court Advance Release Opinions: SC19203 - Tilcon Connecticut, Inc. v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection - Applicant sought a water diversion permit for some of its quarries for water used in its rock...more

Pullman & Comley, LLC

Appellate Notes: Week of April 1, 2013

Pullman & Comley, LLC on

In This Issue: - AC33703 - Sigular v. Gilson - AC33557 - Filippelli v. Saint Mary’s Hospital - AC34524 - Capel v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp. - AC34221 - Nichols v. The Milford Pediatric...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide