News & Analysis as of

Human Rights Act MN Supreme Court

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms ‘Severe or Pervasive’ Standard of Harassing Conduct Claims

In a much-anticipated decision, the Minnesota Supreme Court on June 3, 2020, declined to abandon the requirement that harassing conduct be “severe or pervasive” to be actionable under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA)....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Minnesota Supreme Court Retains Sexual Harassment “Severe-or-Pervasive” Standard, But Instructs Courts to Modernize Assessment of...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the “severe-or-pervasive” framework used to rule on sexual harassment claims, but instructed lower courts to determine what is severe or pervasive in light of today’s definition of...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Minnesota Supreme Court Expands and Contracts Human Rights Act Coverage in Two Decisions on Disability Discrimination

The Minnesota Supreme Court recently issued two decisions affecting employers in the state. In one, the high court overruled a 30-year-old precedent that excluded disabilities covered by the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide