News & Analysis as of

Imports Exports Supreme Court of the United States

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Currents - Energy Industry Insights - December 2019 #2

Court Ruling Vindicates ExxonMobil in New York ‘Climate Change’ Fraud Case - “'The Office of the Attorney General failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that ExxonMobil made any material misstatements or...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Cross-Border Investigations Update - September 2019

This issue of Skadden’s semiannual Cross-Border Investigations Update takes a close look at recent cases, regulatory activity and other key developments, including a review of the first year of GDPR enforcement, analysis of...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Currents - Energy Industry Insights - September 2018 #2

As Storm Looms, 4th Circuit Reverses Ruling Against Dominion on Coal Ash Pollution at Chesapeake Site - "Water pollution from a coal ash landfill and settling ponds at a closed power plant in Chesapeake is not a violation of...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

MarkIt to Market® - July 2018

The July 2018 issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to Market® newsletter discusses how to maintain rights in core trademarks as brands evolve, a reminder regarding importer and exporter liability for shipping counterfeit goods,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Patent Exhaustion: Supreme Court Expands Patent-Limiting Doctrine

The U.S. Supreme Court at the end of the past term handed down a decision, Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., that greatly expanded the doctrine of patent exhaustion. This equitable doctrine prevents a...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

United States Supreme Court Decision In Impression Products Inc. V Lexmark International Inc.

Ladas & Parry LLP on

In 1628, Lord Coke in his “Institutes of the laws of England” summarized the common law on restraints on the alienation of chattels stating that any attempt by a seller to restrict resale or use of the chattel after selling...more

Jackson Walker

Supreme Court Holds Sale of Patented Product Exhausts All Patent Rights

Jackson Walker on

In a nearly unanimous opinion issued recently, the U.S. Supreme Court held “a patentee’s decision to sell a product exhausts all of its patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to...more

Perkins Coie

First Impressions: New Strategies in the New Era of Patent Exhaustion After Impression Products v. Lexmark International

Perkins Coie on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, No. 15–1189, 137 S. Ct. ___, 2017 WL 2322830 (May 30, 2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a patentee’s sale of a product exhausts all of its U.S. patent rights in...more

Stinson LLP

Supreme Court Expands Scope of Patent Exhaustion

Stinson LLP on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a patent owner's initial sale of a product, in the U.S. or in a foreign country, exhausts all of the U.S. patent rights in...more

Hogan Lovells

U.S. - The Supreme Court grants purchasers free “use and enjoyment” of patented items… mostly

Hogan Lovells on

An authorized sale exhausts all patent rights in the item sold. In Impression Products Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. No. 15-1189, May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court found that patent exhaustion is “uniform and...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Supreme Court Limits Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Post-Sale Use of Patented Products

Foley Hoag LLP on

The Supreme Court last week issued its long-awaited decision regarding patent exhaustion in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International. The decision, which overturns longstanding Federal Circuit precedent, curtails...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Exhaustion Doctrine and Limits Post-Sale Control

Burr & Forman on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., the Supreme Court held that after a patent holder sells a patented product, the patent holder cannot control the product by way of patent rights. United States...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Finds Patent Rights Exhausted Overseas

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., the Supreme Court reversed the en banc decision of the Federal Circuit, and held U.S. patents rights exhausted by the patent owner’s sale of a patented article...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

First Sale Extinguishes Patent Rights: Supreme Court Guts Manufacturer Control Over Secondary Market

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Manufacturers have long used patents, licenses and litigation to deter competitive products and restrict secondary markets in their products. The U.S. Supreme Court just dealt these practices a severe blow, confirming that a...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

What the Supreme Court’s Latest Patent Decision Means for Automotive Suppliers

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Although U.S. patent law has long-established limits on enforcement after a patented product has been sold, the technological innovations may put a bulls-eye on the automotive industry for patent litigation. However, when...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Holds First Authorized Domestic or International Sale Exhausts U.S. Patent Rights

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On May 30, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that “patent exhaustion is uniform and automatic” and that patent exhaustion applies, both domestically (in an 8-0...more

Knobbe Martens

U.S. Supreme Court Significantly Restricts Patent Owners’ Ability to Control Resale of Patented Items

Knobbe Martens on

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that an authorized sale of a patented product exhausts all of the patentee’s rights in the...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Supreme Court Overrules and Rewrites 25 Years of Federal Circuit Law on Patent Exhaustion

In keeping with recent erosion of patent rights, patent owners’ power to control the post-sale use and sale of their patented products was severely limited this week by the U.S. Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Supreme Court Rules That Restricted Sales of Patented Cartridges Exhaust Patent Rights

Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., Supreme Court Case 15-1189 (May 30, 2017) - The Supreme Court reverses an en banc Federal Circuit decision and rules that a “conditional sale” that ?transfers...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court Decision Limits Post-Sale Restrictions by Patent Owners

Snell & Wilmer on

The United States Supreme Court today held in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. that the doctrine of patent exhaustion limits post-sale restrictions by patent owners and that patent rights are exhausted...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

The Supreme Court Redefines Patent Exhaustion

In Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc., No. 15-1189 (U.S. May 30, 2017), the Supreme Court fundamentally changed patent licensing in the United States by eliminating a key limitation on patent exhaustion,...more

Knobbe Martens

This Year’s Top Ten IP Cases

Knobbe Martens on

#10 Design Patent Damages § 289 - Samsung Elecs. Co., v. Apple Inc., 580 U.S. _ (Dec. 6, 2016) - In the case of a multicomponent product, the relevant article of manufacture for arriving at a damages award under...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Clarity Put on Hold as FTAIA Conflict/Confusion Continues

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (FTAIA) was enacted in 1982 to help achieve clarity in the application of U.S antitrust laws to international trade. More than 30 years since that effort, the FTAIA has not...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Consumers 1, Publishers 0 in Recent Supreme Court Copyright Decision

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Do you manufacture copyright-protected goods in the U.S. for distribution in the American market and abroad for distribution at lower cost elsewhere? The Supreme Court handed down a decision March 19 with the potential to...more

Carlton Fields

U.S. Supreme Court Applies "First Sale" Copyright Doctrine To Allow Import And Sale Of Gray Goods

Carlton Fields on

On March 19, the United States Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013 WL 1104736, held that the "first sale" doctrine, as codified in the Copyright Act, applies to copyrighted works lawfully manufactured...more

31 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide