News & Analysis as of

Indirect Infringement

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Federal Circuit Rejects Google’s Bid To Shrink ITC Jurisdiction over Post-Importation Acts of Indirect Infringement

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s elimination of “Chevron deference” in the Loper decision, many commentators have suggested that the ITC’s authority over unfair imports under Section 337 might be curtailed. See Loper Bright...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: June 2024

Fish & Richardson on

Universal Connectivity Tech. Inc. v. Dell Tech. Inc., 1-23-cv-01506 (W.D. Tex.), Dkt. No. 34, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower to Judge Pitman - A magistrate judge recommended denying...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court: ANDA Label including Non-Infringing Uses is Not Sufficient to Induce Infringement

In a Hatch-Waxman case, the District Court for the District of New Jersey recently found that a generic label that included an allegedly infringing permissive use did not induce infringement where the label cautioned against...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Split Decisions: Can a Complaint Serve as Knowledge of Indirect Infringement?

A frequent issue seen within patent litigation is whether serving a complaint satisfies the knowledge requirement for post-complaint indirect infringement. This issue affects the amount of, if any, damages a patent owner can...more

Fish & Richardson

ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: May 2023

Fish & Richardson on

In May, there were two new complaints filed at the U.S. International Trade Commission, including complaints filed by Efficient Power Conversion Corp. (Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same) and Shoals...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Yes, Copyright Can Protect Monstrous Mountains

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Typically, Godzilla and other kaiju (Japanese for “strange beast” and also referring to a genre of fiction involving giant monsters) use their armored skin, massive size, and superpowers to protect themselves against almost...more

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP

Is Receipt of a Complaint Sufficient Notice For Claims of Indirect or Willful Infringement?

Forum shopping among patent owners pursuing claims for patent infringement is widespread. One factor a plaintiff may consider in selecting a forum arises out of a split among district courts that the Federal Circuit has yet...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Overlooked Patent Cases: Indirect Infringement Developments

Allegations of indirect patent infringement require, among other things, pleading that the defendant had knowledge of the asserted patent. It is not well-settled law, however, whether notice of a complaint itself satisfies...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - June 2021

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Appeal Nos. 2020-1475, -1605 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2021)- In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit considered an appeal from the International Trade...more

Haug Partners LLP

Intermediary Liability and Indirect Infringement for Marketplaces in Europe and the United States

Haug Partners LLP on

Counterfeiters often act through intermediaries, including online marketplaces, social media companies, and internet service providers (“ISPs”), that may not be aware that their services are being used for infringing...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Sufficiently Pleading Claims of Indirect and Willful Infringement: Alleging that Defendant Generally Monitored Competitors’...

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware recently rejected a plaintiff’s attempt to add to its complaint claims of induced infringement and enhanced damages based on pre-suit conduct. Specifically, the court held...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Connolly Dismisses Plaintiff’s Claims Seeking Declaratory Judgment Of Non-Infringement For Failure To Establish Declaratory...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Colm F. Connolly in Power Integrations, Inc. v. CogniPower LLC, Civil Action No. 20-15-CFC (D.Del. July 1, 2020), the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss counts 3, 4, and...more

Morgan Lewis

Federal Circuit: ‘Consisting Essentially of’ Risks Indefiniteness and No Intent from ANDA Label’s Permissive Use

Morgan Lewis on

A split Federal Circuit panel recently upheld the district court’s judgment of invalidity and noninfringement because the phrase “consisting essentially of” rendered the asserted claims indefinite and the proposed ANDA label...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Intellectual Property - Patents - The World in U.S. Courts: Summer 2019

Direct and Indirect Infringement Claims Allowed to Proceed Against Japanese Parent that Neither Imported nor Sold Allegedly Infringing Cellphones in the US - Semcon IP Inc. v. Kyocera Corp., US District Court for the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Appellate Court Generates Patent Treatise in Car-Tracking Patent Case

Addressing the appeal of a judgment that four US patents were infringed and not invalid, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: • Found waiver regarding a claim construction issue • Found direct infringement...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Polymorphic Patent Survives Obviousness Challenge

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a Hatch-Waxman case involving patents directed to a polymorphic compound for a treatment for polyneuropathic pain, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court finding that a patent was not...more

Goodwin

District of Massachusetts Adopts New Local Patent Rules to Streamline Patent Litigation

Goodwin on

On May 24, 2018, the District of Massachusetts overhauled the Court’s local patent rules in an effort to promote consistency across patent cases and to streamline patent litigation in the District. Local Rule 16.6, entitled...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

UK Supreme Court Decision In Actavis V. Eli Lilly – Doctrine Of Equivalents Recognized

Ladas & Parry LLP on

In its decision of July 12, 2017 in Actavis v. Eli Lilly, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom for the first time formally adopted the concept of a doctrine of equivalents when considering what constituted an infringement...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Patent Infringement Claims Simply Require Alleging Facts Stating a Plausible Claim

Harris Beach PLLC on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) addressed the pleading standards for direct infringement, doctrine of equivalents infringement, indirect infringement and willful infringement in...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Potential Future Harm to Patent Holder Found to Justify Imposition of Preliminary Injunction

In Vecco Instruments Inc. v. SGL Carbon, LLC, No. 17-CV-2217 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2017), Judge Pamela Chen in the Eastern District of New York recently granted Vecco’s motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining SGL Carbon....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Airtight Victory for RV Seal Supplier in Appeal to Overturn Dismissal

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal of direct and indirect infringement claims, finding that plaintiff had properly alleged direct infringement even though defendant did not...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit, With Some Significant Cases from 2016

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

News from Abroad -- Lilly v Actavis -- Supreme Court Introduces a Doctrine of Equivalents in the UK

The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Lilly v Actavis has profound implications for the scope of protection provided by patent claims in the UK. Originally published in J A Kemp on July 23, 2017....more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Comcast Prevails in Part on Striking OpenTV Infringement Contentions

On June 19, 2017, Northern District of California Judge William Alsup granted-in-part and denied-in-part plaintiff Comcast Cable Communications, LLC’s (“Comcast”) motion to strike defendants OpenTV, Inc. and Nagravision SA’s...more

Jones Day

Is A Respondent’s Own Post-Importation Infringement A Violation Of Section 337?

Jones Day on

Before 2011, the ITC routinely found violations of Section 337 based on the infringement of method claims through a respondent’s own use of an article post-importation. This changed when the ITC issued its Opinion in Certain...more

51 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide