News & Analysis as of

Insurance Code CA Supreme Court

Rumberger | Kirk

Automatic Liability: New Risk Under California’s Insurance Lapse Protection Statutes

Rumberger | Kirk on

Last year, the Supreme Court of California held that changes in the California Insurance Code’s life insurance anti-lapse statutes apply to all life insurance policies that were in force when the statutes became effective in...more

Rumberger | Kirk

McHugh, Thomas, and the Long-Term Risk of California Insurance Code Sections 10113.71 and 10113.72

Rumberger | Kirk on

In 2012, the California Legisla­ture enacted changes to the California Insurance Code that provide protections intended to shield consumers from los­ing life insurance coverage due to late or missed insurance premium...more

Cozen O'Connor

California Supreme Court: Insurer Immunity Under California’s Ratemaking Statutes Is Narrow

Cozen O'Connor on

In its recent decision, Villanueva v. Fidelity National Title Company, --- P.3d ---, No. S252035, 2021 WL 1031874 (Cal. Mar. 18, 2021), the California Supreme Court rejected an expansive view of the immunity afforded to title...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California Supreme Court Declines to Defer to Department of Insurance, Finds Self-Storage Protection Plan Not Regulated Insurance

• The California Supreme Court clarifies application of the “principal object and purpose” test, finding that a self-storage operator’s indemnification plans are not subject to regulation under the Insurance Code. •...more

Allen Matkins

Insurance Or Indemnity?

Allen Matkins on

Suppose you desire to place your prized collection of bibelots into storage. The storage company offers an to assume the risk of loss for an additional monthly payment. Have you entered into...more

Perkins Coie

California Makes it Easier to Transfer Insurance Coverage Rights

Perkins Coie on

Last week, the California Supreme Court ruled in Fluor Corp. v. Superior Court, No. S205889, 2015 WL4938295 (Cal. 2015), that an insurer is precluded from refusing to honor an insured’s assignment of rights for past losses...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

CA Supreme Court Finds “Consent-to-Assignment” Clauses Unenforceable After Loss Occurs During the Policy Period

In Fluor Corporation v. Superior Court (No. S205889; filed 8/20/15), the California Supreme Court overruled its earlier decision in Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 934, holding that...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide