News & Analysis as of

Intellectual Property Litigation Canada

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Revival of the Staccato Cherry Patent: Key Considerations for Plant Variety Protection

In recent developments in a years-long conflict over Canadian-bred cherries, the District Court for the Eastern District of Washington has vacated a prior order invalidating a U.S. plant patent over the Staccato cherry tree...more

Smart & Biggar

Alexion awarded injunction against Amgen in SOLIRIS patent action; Court considers anticipation by incorporation by reference

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court has granted Alexion a declaration of infringement and an injunction preventing Amgen from manufacturing, using, and selling its proposed biosimilar eculizumab product, BEKEMV, in Canada until the expiration...more

Smart & Biggar

SCC to revisit “method of medical treatment” patent claims

Smart & Biggar on

This spring, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) will consider the scope of patentable subject-matter as it relates to “methods of medical treatment”....more

Smart & Biggar

When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing

Smart & Biggar on

How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Medical Corporation, Case...more

Smart & Biggar

Avoiding a finding of ambiguity and ensuring patent validity: the importance of a comprehensive disclosure and defining coined...

Smart & Biggar on

On June 7, 2024, the Federal Court issued its Judgment and Reasons in Tekna Plasma Systems Inc v AP&C Advanced Powders & Coatings Inc ( 2024 FC 871), finding all claims of the Defendant’s Canadian Patent No 3,003,502 (502...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Un jugement clarifie les délais de prescription applicables aux réclamations pour contrefaçon de brevet en Alberta

Le 28 janvier 2025, une rare formation de cinq juges de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta (l’« ABCA ») a rendu un jugement unanime et très attendu dans l’affaire JL Energy Transportation Inc. v. Alliance Pipeline Limited...more

Smart & Biggar

Avoiding the hindsight trap in the context of a patent obviousness analysis

Smart & Biggar on

While courts have often warned that hindsight bias should be avoided when assessing whether a patented invention would have been obvious to the skilled person, the application of this principle can be challenging in practice....more

Smart & Biggar

Relief under Canada’s stringent “due care” standard for missed maintenance fees? Federal Court requires CIPO to consider events...

Smart & Biggar on

In Matco Tools Corporation v Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 118 (Matco Tools), the Federal Court found that a decision by the Commissioner of Patents to refuse to reinstate a patent application following the failure to...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP litigation 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

In 2024, we witnessed several notable developments in Canadian IP litigation. These included the Supreme Court granting leave for an appeal on the patentability of methods of medical treatment, a successful patent invalidity...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Limitations for Patent Infringement Claims: Alberta Law Clarified by Rare Five-Member Appellate Panel

On January 28, 2025, a rare five-member panel of the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) issued its unanimous and much-anticipated decision in JL Energy Transportation Inc. v. Alliance Pipeline Limited Partnership (Decision). The...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian trademark law 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

In this article, we review a number of notable Canadian trademark cases from 2024 and highlight key developments in Canadian trademarks practice. On February 5, 2025, join us for an insightful webinar as we deliver a roundup...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian IP litigation 2024: a year in review - February 12th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

Join us for an insightful session as our presenters Matthew Burt, Daniel Davies and Jean-Sébastien Dupont provide an annual summary of key developments in Canadian IP litigation. This webinar offers a valuable opportunity for...more

Smart & Biggar

Costs awards in Canadian IP proceedings – update and future directions

Smart & Biggar on

Most IP litigation in Canada takes place in the Federal Court. Pursuant to the Federal Courts Rules1, the Court has a broad discretion in awarding costs. However, the Federal Court will typically order the losing party to pay...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian patent law 2024: a year in review - February 11th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

2024 was an active year in Canadian patent law. Canadian courts issued several decisions on the merits regarding invalidity and/or infringement, and considered due care in the context of paying maintenance fees, regulatory...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian trademark law 2024: a year in review - February 5th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

Join us for an insightful session as our presenters Pelle Berends, Tierney G.B. Deluzio, Meika Ellis and Kwan T. Loh deliver a roundup of Canadian trademark law, highlighting some of the most important new cases and practice...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2024 Design Patents Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

As we predicted in our 2023 report, 2024 was a banner year for design rights in the U.S. and elsewhere. In last year’s report, we noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) agreed to consider en banc...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Landmark Summer for Design Patent Law

Bennett Jones LLP on

The world of intellectual property (IP) underwent some significant transformations this summer, with recent changes from the U.S. Federal Circuit and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) reshaping the landscape of...more

Smart & Biggar

Artificial intelligence (AI) advocacy in the Federal Court

Smart & Biggar on

In April 2023, a curious law professor and lawyer submitted his “Introductory Civil Procedure” exam to ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, to see how it would score. The results were surprising: ChatGPT outperformed over 70% of his...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Cross-border IP strategies for IP owners and litigators - September 18th, 2:00 pm PDT

Smart & Biggar on

Explore skinny labelling & obviousness in Canada and Australia - If you are an intellectual property (IP) owner, a litigator or an in-house legal professional managing IP litigation in multiple jurisdictions, don’t miss...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Cross-border IP strategies for IP owners and litigators - September 12th, 12:00 pm GMT

Smart & Biggar on

Explore skinny labelling & obviousness in Canada and Australia - If you are an intellectual property (IP) owner, a litigator or an in-house legal professional managing IP litigation in multiple jurisdictions, don’t miss...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Did you plead that? On a Bifurcation Motion, Federal Court in Amazon.com Clarifies that Alleged Complexity

Bennett Jones LLP on

In intellectual property cases, parties often agree to split their proceeding between liability and subsequent quantification phases if they believe that a "bifurcation" would simplify the litigation. Bifurcation is justified...more

Smart & Biggar

Steps to consider before sending a cease-and-desist letter

Smart & Biggar on

The intellectual property (IP) of your business has value. IP can take several forms, including patent and trademark registrations, or intellectual property rights arising from common law, such as trade secrets, confidential...more

Smart & Biggar

BYOOVIZ is confusing with BEOVU: Federal Court finds violation of Novartis’ trademark rights

Smart & Biggar on

In a decision dated January 24, 2024, Justice Pallotta allowed Novartis’ application, finding that Biogen and Samsung’s use of the trademark BYOOVIZ in association with an ophthalmologic drug violates Novartis’ rights in its...more

Smart & Biggar

False alarm: the risks of groundless online takedown complaints

Smart & Biggar on

Online takedowns are an essential and effective tool for intellectual property rightsholders. Such tools are a common response to infringement on online marketplaces. A recent Canadian decision highlights the risks associated...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP Litigation 2023: Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

The year 2023 witnessed several developments in Canadian IP litigation. From summary judgment finding its limits to the denial of a permanent injunction for the first time in almost three decades, several cases decided in...more

39 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide