News & Analysis as of

Intellectual Property Protection Amgen Patent Infringement

Morgan Lewis

Blockbuster Biologics Review | Issue 26

Morgan Lewis on

Welcome to our quarterly update relating to biologics and biosimilars, including post-grant and patent litigation challenges to blockbuster biologics. Since the enactment of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more

Venable LLP

Celltrion and Amgen Reach Settlement in Prolia® / Xgeva® Biosimilar Litigation

Venable LLP on

On January 24, 2025, Amgen announced it had reached a settlement with Celltrion in Case No. 1:24-cv-06497 (D.N.J.) related to Celltrion’s proposed biosimilar of Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab), CT-P41....more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

The Pleading Standard for Complex Technology? It's Complex.

Can a patentee really just take a pass on alleging that an accused product meets a limitation in an asserted claim, even where the case involves complex technology? That's the upshot of the court's decision in Lindis Biotech,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. Otezla® (Apremilast)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Nos. 2022-1147, 2022-1149, 2022-1150, 2022-1151, 2023 WL 2994166 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2023) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Cunningham, and Stark presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from...more

A&O Shearman

Half an hour for a bifurcation: UPC Central Division rejects preliminary objection after first oral hearing

A&O Shearman on

The decision concerns the time of filing and admissibility of a revocation action at the Central Division when a parallel infringement action is filed at a local division (Art. 33(4) UPCA). Art 33(4) UPCA states that...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Early Adoption of the Unified Patent Court

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) opened its doors on June 1, 2023. Nineteen actions were initiated during the first six weeks, across a range of subject areas and case values. It had been widely assumed that large companies...more

Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC

Enablement Unchanged: Amgen v. Sanofi and the Future of Software Patents

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) addressed the enablement requirement under Section 112 of the Patent Act, placing this into sharper focus with the Amgen v. Sanofi case. This landmark...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 2018-2414, 2019-1086, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2020) (Circuit Judges Newman, Lourie, and Taranto presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Goldberg,...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - January 2020

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, et al., Appeal Nos. 2018-2414, et al. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2020) - In this appeal from Markman and summary judgment opinions by the district court in a...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Biosimilar Litigation Trends and Lessons Learned in 2019

It has been nearly 10 years since the U.S. Biosimilars Pathway (the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) was enacted. The first biosimilar product in U.S. history was approved and launched in 2015. Ten biosimilars...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

THE COURT DENIED DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE ITS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFF AFTER THE AT-RISK LAUNCH AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT OF ANOTHER DEFENDANT. Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, No. 16-853-MSG...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The Court Denied Defendant’s Motion To Enforce Its Settlement Agreement With Plaintiff After The At-risk Launch And Subsequent Settlement Of Another Defendant. ...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Cipla Ltd. v. Amgen Inc., No. 19-44-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74970 (D. Del. May 2, 2019) (Stark, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Sensipar® (cinacalcet HCl); U.S. Patent No. 9,375,405 (“the ’405...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, Civ. No. 16-0853 (MSG), 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125631 (D. Del. July 27, 2018) (Goldberg, J.)....more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Amgen v. Adello: A Blind Biosimilar Infringement Lawsuit

Last month, Amgen sued Adello Biologics, a US-based biosimilar maker, for patent infringement under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) in connection with Adello’s proposed biosimilar of Amgen’s...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amgen Inc. v. Alkem Labs. Ltd.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Alkem Labs. Ltd., Civ. No. 17-cv-815-GMS, -817-GMS, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208124 (D. Del. Dec. 19, 2017) (Sleet, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Sensipar® (cinacalcet HCl); U.S. Patent...more

Ladas & Parry LLP

Skipping The Patent Dance: U.S. Supreme Court In Amgen V Sandoz Makes It More Difficult For Patent Owners To Delay Marketing Of...

Ladas & Parry LLP on

On June 12, 2017, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Thomas in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the United States Supreme Court considered the complex statutory scheme that attempts to expedite resolution of patent...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide