News & Analysis as of

Intellectual Property Protection › Patent Litigation › Litigation Fees & Costs

Fenwick & West LLP

A Recent Tax Ruling Has Made ANDA Litigation Less Burdensome for Generics

Fenwick & West LLP on

In Actavis v. U.S., a case at the intersection of tax law and patent law, the Federal Circuit held that generic drug companies’ Hatch-Waxman litigation expenses are “ordinary and necessary business expenses” and can be...more

Jones Day

Third Party IPRs Sway District Court’s Prevailing Party and Costs Rulings

Jones Day on

Third-party IPRs can moot previously favorable decisions and leave a previously successful party to bear its own costs. On October 16, 2024, Judge Rodney Gilstrap denied the plaintiff’s Motion to be Confirmed as the...more

A&O Shearman

UPC Insights: Security for legal costs

A&O Shearman on

The UPC decides that the defendant’s financial situation and location matter. On 30 October 2023, the Munich Central Division of the UPC (the Court) issued an order stating that NanoString must provide security to Harvard...more

Haug Partners LLP

A U.S. View on the UPC – Part 5: Of Costs and Fees (and Getting Them Back)

Haug Partners LLP on

On June 1, 2023, the new European Unified Patent Court (UPC) will open its doors, and enforcement of European patents in (currently) 17 contract member states will be possible with one action. This series of articles –...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

ANDA Litigation Settlements - Fall 2019

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Please see full Chart below for more information....more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide