News & Analysis as of

Interested Parties

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Federal Circuit Expands What It Means to be an ‘Interested Party’ to Bring Bid Protest

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) continues to redefine the Court of Federal Claims’ (COFC) ability to hear cases affecting all stages of the federal procurement process....more

Lathrop GPM

Regulators Examining Interested Party Transactions in Healthcare and in other Nonprofits

Lathrop GPM on

State attorneys general, the IRS, and other regulators are focused on “interested party” (conflict-of-interest) transactions in the healthcare and nonprofit sectors. While these transactions are generally permissible and may...more

Sands Anderson PC

Your Final Judgment Ain’t Necessarily So if You Forgot the Necessaries

Sands Anderson PC on

The Supreme Court of Virginia put on a little tutorial last week on the subject of “necessary parties” to a lawsuit. It’s a smart lesson and a useful reminder that when we try a case, we have to be careful to remember to...more

Woods Rogers

GAO Sustains Protest for Agency’s Improper Cost Adjustment

Woods Rogers on

The Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) recently sustained a protest in the matter of Vectrus Mission Solutions Corporation; Vanquish Worldwide, LLC where an agency improperly adjusted an offeror’s proposal price upward...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

Ohio Supreme Court holds that both the MTA and DMA apply to mineral interests in West v. Bode

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Ohio oil and gas stakeholders received another landmark decision from the Ohio Supreme Court in West v. Bode, 2020 — N.E.3d — 2020 WL 7049820 2020-Ohio-5473. Specifically, the Court held that both the Marketable Title Act...more

Morgan Lewis

Singapore's Amended Listing Rules: Risk-Based Approach to Quarterly Reporting, Continuous Disclosures

Morgan Lewis on

With effect from February 7, the Mainboard Rules and Catalist Rules of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited will be revised to adopt a risk-based approach to quarterly reporting and to enhance the continuous...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Government Contract Acquisitions and the Pending Proposal Problem

Government Accountability Office (GAO) protest decision casts doubt on the viability of pending proposals following government contract asset sales. GAO held that agency reasonably disqualified contractor whose quotation...more

Winstead PC

A Court Rejects A Trust Protector’s Claims and Holds That A Trustee Properly Merged Trusts

Winstead PC on

In In re Macy Lynne Quintanilla Trust, a settlor created three trusts for his children in 2014. No. 04-17-00753-CV2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 8223 (Tex. App.—San Antonio October 10, 2018, no pet. history)....more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Government Contractor M&A Deals Beware

Recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) protest decision on standing holds key implications for government contract asset deals. GAO held that contractor who had sold relevant contract assets to another company...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Have a Dog In Someone Else’s Fight? Intervene to Protect Your Right!

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Generally speaking, most people want to avoid becoming entangled in litigation. But what happens when an action is pending and, although your client is not a party, his or her interests may be adversely affected? Move to...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Circuit Resolves Jurisdictional Questions In Context Of Section 853(n) Asset Forfeiture Proceeding

In a short opinion in United States v. Ohle, 16-601-cr, the Second Circuit (Leval, Calabresi, Cabranes) resolved two open questions about the application of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, both in the context of a...more

Burr & Forman

All Experience is not Good Experience – Experience Ratings & 11 U.S.C. § 363(f)

Burr & Forman on

Recently, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama joined with a number of courts in finding that a debtor’s ability to sell their assets free and clear of any “interests” in property encompassed the right to...more

McDermott Will & Emery

California FTB Schedules Interested Parties Meeting on Short Notice to Discuss Issues in the Regulations on Sourcing Income from...

The California Franchise Tax Board has scheduled an Interested Parties Meeting to discuss proposed changes to its apportionment regulations. Several years ago, when the statute called for sourcing receipts from services and...more

Morgan Lewis

Russia: New Rules on Approvals of Certain Corporate Actions

Morgan Lewis on

The new rules, which take effect on 1 January 2017, will apply to both limited liability and stock companies. Russia recently changed the laws governing the approval of certain corporate actions....more

McDermott Will & Emery

California FTB to Discuss Apportionment of Combined Group Income

McDermott Will & Emery on

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) will hold a second Interested Parties Meeting at their office in Rancho Cordova on April 20, 2016, dealing with the apportionment of income for combined reporting groups with both...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Director Independence Revisited

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

Interested director transactions (transactions where one or more members of a board of directors will “receive a personal financial benefit … that is not equally shared by the stockholders.” Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927,...more

Proskauer - Not for Profit/Exempt...

Attorney General Issues Guidance On State Not-for-Profit Law

On April 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s office released two guidance documents addressing key provisions of the New York Not-for Profit Corporation Law (the N-PCL) enacted as part of the Non-profit Revitalization...more

Allen Matkins

When It Comes To Director Compensation, California Is Not Delaware

Allen Matkins on

Yesterday, I wrote about my disagreements with the approach to director compensation adopted by the Delaware Court of Chancery in Calma v. Templeton, 114 A.3d 563 (Del. Ch. 2015) and Seinfeld v. Slager, 2012 Del. Ch. LEXIS...more

Morris James LLP

'Cornerstone' Decision Reinforces Del. Corporate Law Bedrock Principles

Morris James LLP on

Delaware law has long provided that the decisions of disinterested and independent directors who receive no special benefit from a transaction ought not be the basis of personal liability in monetary damages. To subject...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

2015 Nevada Business Entities Law Update

The 78th Session of the Nevada Legislature made a number of changes to provisions of Title 7 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) governing business entities, including corporations, limited liability companies and limited...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

When JV Partners Disagree About Whether To Protest

These days, government contractors are pursuing federal work through joint ventures with increasing frequency. Among the reasons for this are that joint ventures allow contractors to combine resources and share risk. Not...more

Butler Snow LLP

I Think We’re Alone Now: Applying the Common-Interest Privilege When No Litigation is Pending

Butler Snow LLP on

Recently, the New York Appellate Division broadened that state’s common-interest privilege doctrine. In Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 124 A.D.3d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep’t 2014), the court removed...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

T&E Litigation Newsletter- April 2015

Goulston & Storrs PC on

On April 6th the Appeals Court issued a decision concerning standing in guardianship proceedings under the Massachusetts Uniform Probate Code (“MUPC”) that may influence future cases involving the interpretation of other...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

California FTB to Consider Revisions to Combination Regulations for Mixed Financial and Non-Financial Reporting Groups

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has announced the scheduling of an Interested Parties Meeting (IPM) for December 4, 2014 on the topic of possible regulatory efforts regarding the proper treatment of mixed...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Even Offerors Eliminated Before the Competitive Range May Have Protest Standing

On January 14, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) held that an offeror had standing to challenge the exclusion of its proposal from a competition even prior to a competitive range,...more

25 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide