News & Analysis as of

Medicare Remand

Foley Hoag LLP

American Hospital Association et al. v. Becerra et al.: Supreme Court Rejects CMS Policy to Adjust Medicare Part B Payments for...

Foley Hoag LLP on

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court released its opinion in American Hospital Association et al. v. Becerra et al., a case that involves the proper method for the Medicare program to reimburse hospitals for outpatient drugs...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

A New Circuit Split: FCA Protects Former Employees from Post-Employment Retaliation in the Sixth

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Over a vigorous dissent last week, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and held the False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation...more

Perkins Coie

AseraCare Settlement Ends Medical Judgment False Claims Act Case With a Whimper

Perkins Coie on

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has reached a settlement with hospice company AseraCare, closing a 12-year-old saga that carries substantial implications for False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement in cases involving a...more

Holland & Knight LLP

AseraCare Announces Settlement of Landmark False Claims Act Case for $1 Million

Holland & Knight LLP on

After litigation spanning more than a decade, hospice provider AseraCare announced its $1 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in a closely-watched False Claims Act (FCA) case in the U.S. District...more

King & Spalding

False Claims Act Case Based on Stark Law Violations to Continue After the Third Circuit Revives Whistleblowers’ Claims

King & Spalding on

On September 17, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit revived three whistleblowers’ claims alleging that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and neurosurgeons employed by three subsidiary...more

Baker Donelson

Disagreements over a Medical Judgment Cannot Form the Basis for Liability Under the False Claims Act

Baker Donelson on

A new federal court decision offers a ray of light to those providers defending false claims actions based on an alleged lack of medical necessity. On September 9, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...more

Troutman Pepper

Eleventh Circuit Says Difference Of Opinion Does Not Establish Falsity In False Claims Act Case

Troutman Pepper on

On September 9, in a setback for AseraCare but an overall win for hospice providers, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed a Northern District of Alabama decision to grant a new trial in a False Claims Act (FCA) case against...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Eleventh Circuit Holds Differences in Clinical Judgment Do Not Create FCA Liability for Hospice Provider

The Eleventh Circuit agreed with the trial court that the government must do more than present expert evidence that a physician’s clinical judgment was inaccurate to establish falsity under the False Claims Act. Nonetheless,...more

King & Spalding

District Court Refuses to Order HHS to Apply Pre-2004 Formula for DSH Payments Following Remand from Supreme Court

King & Spalding on

On September 4, 2019, following remand from the Supreme Court’s decision in Azar v. Alina Health Services, No. 17-1484 (U.S. June 3, 2019), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia declined plaintiff...more

Hogan Lovells

Eleventh Circuit Confirms: Mere Difference of Opinion Between Physicians Does Not Establish Falsity Under the False Claims Act

Hogan Lovells on

More than two years after the Northern District of Alabama granted summary judgment in a False Claims Act (FCA) case in favor of AseraCare Inc., holding that “contradiction based on clinical judgment or opinion alone cannot...more

Baker Donelson

Court Again Strikes Down 340B Payment Cuts; Remands Unlawful Payment Rules to HHS to Provide Relief

Baker Donelson on

A federal district court has ruled, for a second time, in favor of hospitals challenging the legality of Medicare payment cuts targeting certain hospitals in the 340B drug pricing program. In a May 6, 2019 decision, the U.S....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

340B Rate Cuts: DC Court Enjoins and Remands CMS’ 2018 and 2019 Reductions for Hospital Outpatients

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On May 6, 2019, a federal district court held that the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) 2018 and 2019 rate reductions for 340B Program participants, including safety net On May 6, 2019, a federal district court...more

King & Spalding

Federal Court Declines to Vacate Secretary’s Ultra Vires 340B Rate Cut and Remands to CMS to Fashion Proper Remedy

King & Spalding on

In a long-awaited ruling, on May 6, 2019, Judge Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia declined to vacate the Secretary’s CYs 2018 and 2019 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)...more

K&L Gates LLP

K&L Gates Triage: Medicare Overpayment Recoupment Halted by Court

K&L Gates LLP on

In a recent decision, the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, granted a health care provider a preliminary injunction to prevent the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") from withholding Medicare payments...more

Baker Donelson

Court of Appeals Reverses D.D.C. Order Requiring HHS to Eliminate Medicare Appeals Backlog by December 31, 2020

Baker Donelson on

Hopes were dashed for sooner relief from the backlog of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) appeals. With the backlog of Medicare reimbursement appeals steadily growing, a reversal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Supreme Court Implied False Certification Case Reargued to First Circuit

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On Tuesday, October 25, 2016, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Escobar, et al. v. Universal Health Services, Inc. This case was sent back...more

Baker Donelson

Court Upholds CMS's Inclusion of Part C Days in Medicare Fraction of DSH Calculation FYE 2012

Baker Donelson on

On August 17, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the position of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) that Part C patients were to be considered as “entitled to...more

Baker Donelson

D.C. District Court Strikes Down PRRB's Application of "Self-Disallowance" Jurisdictional

Baker Donelson on

In Banner Heart Hospital, et al. v. Burwell, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Court) held on August 19, 2016, that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB) incorrectly declined to hear an...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Ninth Circuit Unanimously Overrules Long-Standing “Original Source” Precedent; Makes it Easier to Qualify as an Original Source...

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

For 23 years, the Ninth Circuit required that a relator establish three elements to qualify as an “original source” under the False Claims Act: (1) the relator must have direct and independent knowledge of the information on...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide