News & Analysis as of

Motion for Summary Judgment Negligence

Marshall Dennehey

Defense Victory: Summary Judgment Granted for Corporate Nursing Home Defendants in Medical Negligence Case

Marshall Dennehey on

Leslie M. Jenny and Gabriella M. Wittbrod, both of our Cleveland, OH office, were granted summary judgment on behalf of their corporate nursing home clients in this medical negligence case. Judge Phillip S. Naumoff of the...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion for Summary Judgment of Gasket and Packing Manufacturer Granted in Part and Denied in Part

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division - Plaintiffs Chloyde Pelton and Shirley Pelton sued Defendant John Crane Inc. for negligence, willful and wanton conduct, and...more

White and Williams LLP

Drawing the Line: In Tennessee, the Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply to Contracts for Services

White and Williams LLP on

In Commercial Painting Co. v. Weitz Co. LLC, No. W2019-02089-SC-R11-CV, 2023 Tenn. LEXIS 39 (Weitz), the Supreme Court of Tennessee (Supreme Court) considered whether the economic loss doctrine barred the plaintiff’s claims...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket Manufacturer’s Motions for Summary Judgment Granted, in part, Pursuant to Maritime Law

Goldberg Segalla on

Court - United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Plaintiff’s decedent, Joseph Pine, served as a fireman aboard the USS Constellation from 1965-1967. After he died from mesothelioma a month...more

Goldberg Segalla

Court Issues Final Orders Regarding Various Motions of Automotive Defendants

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - Defendants Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Morse Tec LLC, and American Honda Motor Co. Inc. filed various motions for summary judgment, or in the alternative...more

Segal McCambridge

Court Finds Plaintiff’s Experience as Risk Taker Undercuts Her Legal Claim at Adventure Park

Segal McCambridge on

Plaintiff Courtney Barrett was 34 years old when she chose to participate in the Warrior Course at Urban Air Trampoline and Adventure Park. Ms. Barrett was not new to thrill seeking, boasting an impressive background in...more

White and Williams LLP

Insurer Doomed in Delaware by the Sutton Rule

White and Williams LLP on

In Donegal Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thangavel, No. 379, 2022, 2023 Del. LEXIS 227, the Supreme Court of Delaware (Supreme Court) considered whether the Sutton Rule prevented the plaintiff from pursuing subrogation against the...more

White and Williams LLP

Insurer Springs a Leak in Its Pursuit of Subrogation

White and Williams LLP on

In Nationwide Prop & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fireline Corp., No. 1:20-cv-00684, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104241, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (District Court) considered whether the events giving rise...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Court-Appointed Partition Brokers

In California, several classes of persons are entitled to some form of immunity protecting them from liability for activities performed in connection with judicial proceedings. For example, “judicial immunity” bars civil...more

Goldberg Segalla

Asbestos Distributor Defendant Obtains Summary Judgment Due to Lack of Identification

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Jan. 13 Plaintiff Glen King  alleged that his exposure to asbestos during the course of his employment with the United States Navy, Louisiana State...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Offer To Settle Expired When The Court Granted Summary Judgment Motion

Trujillo v. City of Los Angeles, 2022 WL 15119812 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022) - In a negligence case, the City of Los Angeles made a settlement offer to the plaintiff pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 998 a few days before the...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Negligence is Not Enough/Set-Up Tactics are Disfavored

Over the past 10 years, policy limit settlement demands with myriad conditions have become the norm. In many instances, the conditions are imposed in the hope that the insurer will falter in its efforts to comply. Unless...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiff unable to provide any legitimate evidence against motions for summary judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court of the District of Nevada, September 19, 2022 - The plaintiff commenced this action in early 2020 by filing his Complaint against 13 defendants.  He suffers from mesothelioma and alleged...more

White and Williams LLP

Part of the Whole: Idaho District Court Holds Economic Loss Rule Bars Tort Claims Related to Water Supply Line that was Part of...

White and Williams LLP on

In Safeco Ins. Co. of Ill. v. LSP Prods. Grp., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139566, the United States District Court for the District of Idaho (District Court) considered whether the plaintiff’s tort claims against the manufacturer...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motions for Summary Judgment in Jones Act Matter Denied on Statute of Limitations and Causation Grounds

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, May 9, 2022 - In this asbestos action, decedent Carlo Badamo served on several vessels during his time as a merchant marine from 1944 to 1955....more

Goldberg Segalla

Summary Judgment Granted as Premises Owner Did Not Owe a Duty to Independent Contractor’s Employee

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, February 15, 2022 - In this asbestos action, Carl Gay alleged that he developed mesothelioma after a forty-year career. From 1974 until 1976, Gay worked as a...more

White and Williams LLP

Can You Prove It? New Jersey Court Holds That Plaintiff Alleging Negligent Destruction of Evidence Failed to Sufficiently Prove...

White and Williams LLP on

In 27-35 Jackson Ave., LLC v. Samsung Fire & Marine Inc. Co., No. A-2925-19, 2021 N.J. Super LEXIS 120, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division (Appellate Division) considered whether the lower court properly...more

Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP

A Party Seeking a Continuance to Oppose a Motion for Summary Judgment Must Act in Good Faith and With Diligence or the Request...

OVERVIEW In Braganza v. Albertson’s (July 29, 2021, WL 3204494), the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Two, held that a party seeking a continuance of a hearing on a motion for summary judgment must act in good faith...more

White and Williams LLP

An Insured In-Part: Michigan Court Holds That Tenant Is an Implied Co-Insured on Landlord’s Property Insurance Only With Respect...

White and Williams LLP on

In Westfield Inc. Co. v. Ritcher, No. 20-CV-12692, 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 94926, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan considered whether a residential tenant was an implied co-insured on the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Lawyers for the...

Plaintiff Cannot Maintain Legal Malpractice Action Absent Proof of Fraudulent Inducement to Settle

Jibreel Townsend v. Spear, Greenfield and Richman, P.C., Mark Greenfield, Rand Spear, Esq. Superior Court of Pennsylvania, No. 2950 EDA 2019 (8/13/20) - Brief Summary - A Pennsylvania court affirmed summary judgment in a...more

Winstead PC

Federal Court Holds That Texas Does Not Have An Independent Aiding And Abetting Claim For Breach Of Fiduciary Duty But Holds That...

Winstead PC on

In Taylor v. Rothstein Kass & Co., PLLC, a receiver for a failed business sued an accounting firm for various claims arising from the auditor’s issuance of a clean audit report concerning certain financial statements. No....more

White and Williams LLP

Establishing Proximate Cause Where Both Roads Lead to the Defendant

White and Williams LLP on

In Westfield Ins. Group v. Pure Renovations, LLC, 2019-Ohio-4773, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4829, the Court of Appeals of Ohio considered whether the lower court properly granted the defendant’s summary judgment motion. In its...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Asbestos/Duty of Care: Connecticut Court Addresses Construction Project/Liability Issues

The Superior Court of Connecticut (Judicial District of Hartford) (“Court”) addressed in a September 30th opinion certain issues arising in an asbestos exposure case. See Julian Poce, et al., v. O&G Industries, Inc., et al.,...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Insurer Prohibited from Relitigating Issue 'Necessarily Determined' by Federal Court

Judge Sanders granted partial summary judgment in favor of Raw Seafoods, Inc. (RSI), a seafood processor, in a coverage dispute with its insurer, Hanover Insurance Group (Hanover). Judge Sanders held that Hanover was bound by...more

Butler Snow LLP

Great Scott! The Sixth Circuit Revives Hoverboard Lawsuit

Butler Snow LLP on

The classic 1989 film Back to the Future II famously predicted that humans would be zipping around on hoverboards in the year 2015. The film wasn’t too far off. Hoverboards debuted in the 2000s and gained immense popularity...more

33 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide