News & Analysis as of

Motion to Dismiss Biotechnology

Woodruff Sawyer

Special Report: Biotechnology Companies & Securities Class Action Litigation (2024)

Woodruff Sawyer on

In 2024, biotechnology companies were the second most targeted industry for securities class action litigation, according to the D&O Databox™, Woodruff Sawyer’s proprietary database of securities class action suits. The...more

Goodwin

Securities Litigation Against Life Sciences Companies 2024 Year in Review

Goodwin on

Welcome to our ninth annual report on US securities class actions filed against publicly traded life sciences companies, which include pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and healthcare companies....more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

District Court: Factual Disputes Preclude Application of Safe Harbor to Gene Editing Technology at the Pleading Stage

The District of Delaware recently denied a motion to dismiss a patent infringement complaint involving gene editing technology that sought relief under the Safe Harbor Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act. Specifically, the...more

King & Spalding

Dismissal of Securities Claims Against Utah Biotech Company Provides Guidance in Securities Cases Involving Food & Drug...

King & Spalding on

A district court in Utah recently dismissed claims brought against a biotechnology company and its officers under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 adopted thereunder. The order in Richfield v....more

Goodwin

Delaware Court of Chancery Declines to Dismiss Investment Firm from Stockholder Derivative Suit

Goodwin on

Delaware Court of Chancery Declines to Dismiss Investment Firm from Stockholder Derivative Suit; Delaware Chancery Court Dismisses Majority of Claims Alleging that California Biotech Firm Profited from Nonpublic Information...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

District Court Invalidates Dietary Supplement Patents On Motion To Dismiss

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California invalidated several dietary supplement product and method patents as being directed to ineligible subject matter, even though they claimed products providing a...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Oxford Immunotec Ltd. v. Qiagen, Inc. (D. Mass. 2016)

Magistrate Recommends That Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Be Allowed for Kit Claims and Denied for Method Claims - Last month, in Oxford Immunotec Ltd. v. Qiagen, Inc., Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell of the U.S....more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | July 2015

Knobbe Martens on

Nunc Pro Tunc Assignments Insufficient To Confer Retroactive Standing - In ALPS SOUTH, LLC v. OHIO WILLOW WOOD CO., Appeal Nos. 2013-1452, 2013-1488, 2014-1147, and 2014-1426, the Federal Circuit reversed the denial of a...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide