News & Analysis as of

MT Supreme Court Insurance Industry

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Left Coast Appeals

This Week At The Ninth: Bivens and Montana Insurance Law

This week, the Court addresses the availability of a Bivens cause of action against federal officials and certifies two insurance law questions to the Montana Supreme Court. The Court holds that a Bivens cause of action...more

White and Williams LLP

Montana Supreme Court Tackles Decade-Old Coverage Dispute Concerning Asbestos Mineworker Claims

White and Williams LLP on

On November 23, 2021, the Montana Supreme Court issued an almost unanimous decision in National Indemnity Company v. State of Montana, a ten-year-old coverage dispute arising from claims against the State of Montana alleging...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Prior Knowledge Provisions Barred Coverage for Malpractice Claim Based on Pre-Policy Sanctions and Default Judgment

Wiley Rein LLP on

The Montana Supreme Court has held that there was no coverage under a lawyers professional liability policy for a client’s malpractice claim because the lawyer knew of and failed to disclose, prior to the insured law firm’s...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - March 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

In our March Insurance Update, we discuss four state supreme court cases and four cybercrime cases. The state high courts address: •From whose perspective should a consent-to-settle provision be judged? •What standard...more

Cozen O'Connor

Montana: Settlement Without Defending Insurer Is Not Presumptively Reasonable

Cozen O'Connor on

In Draggin' Y Cattle Co., Inc. v. Junkermier, Clark, Campanella, Stevens, P.C., --- P.3d ---, 2019 MT 97 (Mont. 2019), the Montana Supreme Court held that where an insurer is defending, a settlement by the insured and the...more

Cozen O'Connor

Montana Holds Insured’s Stipulated Judgment Was Collusive and Unreasonable

Cozen O'Connor on

On January 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Montana in Abbey/Land, LLC v. Glacier Construction Partners, LLC, --- P.3d ---, No. DA 17-0705, 2019 WL 350088 (Mont. Jan. 29, 2019), found a settlement and stipulated judgment both...more

Cozen O'Connor

Is a Rock a Landslide? Montana Supreme Court Says Yes

Cozen O'Connor on

In a recent decision, the Montana Supreme Court upheld application of an Earth Movement exclusion to bar coverage for damage to a home when a single large boulder rolled down a hill and smashed into it. In doing so, the court...more

Carlton Fields

How General is “General Aggregate?”

Carlton Fields on

Although the terms are often used interchangeably, there are several key differences between umbrella and excess coverage. One such distinction is that an umbrella policy can apply to multiple underlying policies. This makes...more

Proskauer - Insurance Recovery & Counseling

Montana Joins Majority of Courts Holding That Insurers Must Establish Prejudice to Disclaim Coverage Based on an Insured’s Late...

Joining a majority of states that have addressed the issue, the Montana Supreme Court recently held that “an insurer who does not receive timely notice required by the terms of an insurance policy must demonstrate prejudice...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide