News & Analysis as of

Nintendo Patent Litigation

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Too Many Bites at the Apple?

When a patent owner loses at the International Trade Commission (“ITC”), can it hire new counsel and try again in district court? That question will be answered in Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. et al, No. 3-18-cv-01942...more

Knobbe Martens

Sounding Off: Prosecution Disclaimer Requires Unambiguous Intrinsic Evidence

Knobbe Martens on

GENUINE ENABLING TECHNOLOGY LLC V. NINTENDO CO., LTD - Before Newman, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Western District of Washington. Summary: A finding of prosecution disclaimer must be supported by an unambiguous...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

ITC Threat for Gaming Companies Grows with PTAB Discretionary Denials

While most patent disputes involving gaming companies are located in district courts, the ITC remains a viable option for at least some gaming disputes, where a patent owner can have the U.S. government bar importation of...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. -- Petition for En Banc Rehearing and Amicus Briefs

Proceedings for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,005,303 (Recognicorp, assigned from IQ Biometrix) resulted in an appeal decided on 28 April 2017, which decision was reviewed in this space by Michael Borella, and also...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Guest Post: Regnoicorp -- A Miscarriage of Justice Calling for En Banc Reconsideration

Study of the background to Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. (Fed. Cir. 2017), the subject of Michael Borella's earlier posting, reveals basis for his concerns about lack of analysis of the detailed disclosure of the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Recognicorp, owner of U.S. Patent No. 8,005,303, sued Nintendo for infringement in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. After a transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - March 2016

WilmerHale on

Clare v. Chrysler Group LLC (No. 2015-1999, 3/31/16) (Prost, Moore, Wallach) - Moore, J. Affirming summary judgment of non-infringement of patents related to storage compartment for pickup trucks. The Court rejected...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

When Are Method/Device Hybrid Claims Indefinite?

The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in UltimatePointer v. Nintendo (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2016) provides a reminder of the need to use caution when drafting a claim that could be read to cover both a device and a method of use....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. (W.D. Wash. 2015)

Generic Software Claims Found Ineligible under § 101 - A common theme found in recent patent litigation is that software claims lacking detail are more likely to be found invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The U.S....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Convenience Trumps Potentially Higher Royalties

McDermott Will & Emery on

In re Nintendo of America, Inc. - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a denial of a motion to sever and transfer, directing the district court to grant petitioner’s motion because the transferee...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Identifying Class of Algorithms Insufficient To Satisfy Means-Plus-Function Structure Requirement

Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of America, Inc. - Addressing whether a patent specification provided adequate specificity to satisfy indefiniteness scrutiny of a means-plus-function claim, the U.S. Court of...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Triton Tech of Texas, LLC v. Nintendo of America, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014)

A very experienced patent attorney once told me that you should never write means-plus-function claims unless there is a Luger at your temple. This, the first opinion addressing indefiniteness to come from the Federal...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide