News & Analysis as of

No-Action Relief Board of Directors

Seward & Kissel LLP

SEC Staff Grants No-Action Relief Under Section 17 and Rule 17d-1 Thereunder Allowing Fund to Enter Transaction Agreement with New...

Seward & Kissel LLP on

Who may be interested: Registered Investment Companies; Boards of Directors; and Investment Advisers. Quick Take: The staff of the SEC Division of Investment Management (Staff) recently issued a no-action letter stating...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Precautionary and Prudency Measures for Boards Addressing COVID-19 Business Uncertainties

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented economic disruptions worldwide. Businesses that were previously flourishing are now seeing rapid declines in demand and revenue, disruptions in their supply chains, and other...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Considerations for the 2020 proxy season

Companies preparing for their annual shareholder meetings will need to consider a variety of factors, including new guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and recommendations from Glass, Lewis & Co. (Glass...more

Jones Day

Our Perspective: SEC Should Truly Take "No Action" on Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposal Requests

Jones Day on

The Background: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("the SEC") has announced that it may no longer review no-action letter requests relating to shareholder proposals submitted to companies under Rule 14a-8. The SEC...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

And now for some good news - SEC no-action position provides limited relief for fund in-person voting requirements

On February 28, 2019, the Chief Counsel’s Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Investment Management issued a letter stating its no-action position regarding certain in-person voting requirements...more

Perkins Coie

SEC Staff Relaxes Certain In-Person Board Voting Requirements for Registered Investment Companies

Perkins Coie on

The SEC’s Division of Investment Management has relaxed certain in-person voting requirements for fund boards, subject to certain conditions, in a no-action letter to the Independent Directors Council (the IDC) issued on...more

Morgan Lewis

SEC Staff Relieves Fund Boards of Certain In-Person Voting Requirements

Morgan Lewis on

The US Securities and Exchange Commission staff provides new no-action relief to fund boards of directors from in-person voting requirements under certain circumstances....more

Dechert LLP

SEC Provides No-Action Relief from Certain Fund Director In-Person Meeting Requirements

Dechert LLP on

The Staff of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management (Staff) has issued a no-action letter permitting a registered fund’s board of directors (board) in certain circumstances to meet telephonically, by video conference or...more

WilmerHale

Shareholder Proposals

WilmerHale on

What Is a Proposal? Rule 14a-8(a) defines a shareholder proposal as a ‘‘recommendation or requirement that the company and/or its board of directors take action, which you intend to present at a meeting of the company’s...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

SEC Staff Issues Shareholder Proposal Guidance

On October 23, 2018, the Division of Corporation Finance (Staff) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14J (SLB 14J), which provides important guidance concerning shareholder...more

Bracewell LLP

SEC Releases New Guidance on Shareholder Proposals

Bracewell LLP on

On November 1, 2017, the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission published in Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14I guidance relating to the excludability of certain shareholder proposals...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: Corp Fin Issues New SLB Providing Guidance On Rule 14a-8 Exclusions For “Conflicting Proposals” And “Ordinary Business”

Cooley LLP on

Corp Fin today posted Staff Legal Bulletin 14H providing guidance on two key issues regarding shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8: - the scope and application of Rule 14a-8(i)(9) (the exclusion for conflicting...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Audit Committee Composition

Cooley LLP on

As noted in this article from Compliance Week, the Corp Fin staff have refused to issue no-action relief to Citigroup agreeing that it could exclude from its proxy statement a proposal from the prolific John Chevedden...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

2015 Proxy Season: What to Expect

As we approach this year’s proxy season, it is a good time to reflect on last year’s developments and to plan for this year’s hot topics. A Look Back - In addition to reviewing your own shareholder voting results...more

Cooley LLP

Blog: Whole Foods proxy access saga continues

Cooley LLP on

In her NYT column this past Sunday, Gretchen Morgenson provides an interesting update on the saga of James McRitchie’s proxy access proposal submitted to Whole Foods....more

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog

Whole Foods Can Exclude Proxy Access Proposal

The SEC has granted Whole Foods no action relief to exclude a proxy access proposal submitted under Rule 14a-8. The proponent’s proposal sought a non-binding shareholder resolution to request that the Whole Food’s Board of...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

CFTC Expands No-Action Relief Granted to FBOTs

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Division of Market Oversight previously issued no-action letters to foreign boards of trade (FBOTs), pursuant to which FBOTs that list futures and options for trading are permitted...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide