News & Analysis as of

Notification Requirements Antitrust Provisions

K&L Gates LLP

Australian Mandatory Merger Clearance: Regime Details Starting to Emerge – Government Publishes Draft Determination, ACCC...

K&L Gates LLP on

On 28 March 2025, the Australian Government (the Government) published its draft Determination providing the beginnings of detail about the acquisitions that are the subject of mandatory notification, some of the exceptions...more

White & Case LLP

Australia enacts mandatory merger control law

White & Case LLP on

Australia’s mandatory suspensory merger control regime will come into force on 1 January 2026 following the passing of legislation by both houses of Parliament, representing a major shift for businesses, their advisors and...more

A&O Shearman

Polish Competition Authority clarifies merger control rules on notification of extraterritorial joint ventures

A&O Shearman on

In a much-anticipated move, the Polish Competition Authority's (PCA) revised guidelines on the criteria and procedure for notifying the intention of a concentration (Guidelines) have clarified the criteria for mandatory...more

DLA Piper

Juntos - September 2024

DLA Piper on

Welcome to Juntos, our bulletin that explores antitrust and competition developments across US-Latin America. In this issue, we look at key headlines from throughout 2024....more

K&L Gates LLP

Australian Government Proposes Monetary and Market Share Thresholds for Mandatory Merger Clearance Regime

K&L Gates LLP on

The Australian Government (the Government) opened consultation on Australia’s proposed merger notification thresholds. The Consultation Paper proposes a notification regime that consists of four different thresholds—two based...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Agencies Seek Information on Serial Acquisitions

Epstein Becker & Green on

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) launched a public inquiry seeking information concerning serial acquisitions and roll-up strategies....more

BCLP

Faster, Stronger, and Simpler? Australia’s New Merger Control Regime

BCLP on

On 10 April 2024, Australia’s Federal Government announced far-reaching reforms to its merger control regime, most notably the introduction of a new single, mandatory and suspensory, merger control system. The reform package...more

White & Case LLP

Morocco Competition Council Announces Merger Control Amendments

White & Case LLP on

Morocco has enacted amendments to its competition law that will have significant impacts on its merger control regime. The amendments include increasing the minimum turnover thresholds for merger control filings, introducing...more

White & Case LLP

Saudi Arabia’s General Authority for Competition increases its merger control notification thresholds

White & Case LLP on

On 29 March 2023, Saudi Arabia's antitrust regulator increased the minimum turnover threshold for merger control filings from 100 million to 200 million Saudi Riyals, which should reduce the number of unnecessary...more

White & Case LLP

New Competition Regimes and Increased Antitrust Enforcement across the Middle East & North Africa

White & Case LLP on

The tidal wave of antitrust activity throughout the Middle East & North Africa is expected to continue rising in 2023, as several jurisdictions across the region have started to amend their competition laws, introduce new...more

Jones Day

Global Merger Control Update | Winter 2021

Jones Day on

This Jones Day Global Merger Control Update highlights significant changes in merger control regimes in 2020. In this Update, we review: (i) changes in Australia, Belgium, Botswana, Bulgaria, Ecuador, France, Germany,...more

Hogan Lovells

"Devices for avoidance" don't avoid HSR penalties

Hogan Lovells on

On 10 June 2019 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division, acting at the request of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), filed a complaint and proposed final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

FTC Charges Two Japanese Corporations with Alleged HSR Avoidance Scheme

Two Japanese corporations each agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) charges of violating the premerger notification and waiting period requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Act....more

Bracewell LLP

FTC Warns That Money Doesn't Have to Change Hands to Trigger HSR Filing

Bracewell LLP on

In a recent blog posting, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an important reminder that companies and individuals may have reportable transactions under the Hart-Scott Rodino (HSR) Act even if no payment exchanges...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Federal Trade Commission Announces 2018 Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Thresholds

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On Friday, January 27, 2018, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the revised “size of transaction” thresholds for 2018 for reporting proposed mergers and acquisitions under Section 7A of the Clayton Act, as added by...more

Hogan Lovells

New HSR and interlocking directorate thresholds announced for 2018

Hogan Lovells on

On 26 January 2018, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released the annual jurisdictional adjustments for premerger notification filings made pursuant to Section 7A of the Clayton Act, known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust...more

Hogan Lovells

HSR and Interlocking Directorate Thresholds Announced for 2017

Hogan Lovells on

On 19 January 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released the annual jurisdictional adjustments for premerger notification filings made pursuant to Section 7A of the Clayton Act, known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide