News & Analysis as of

Oppression Remedy

Goldberg Segalla

Supplier Defendant Succeeds in Opposing Punitive Damages

Goldberg Segalla on

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - In this asbestos action, the court considered various defense motions. Defendant Western Auto Supply company filed a request opposing punitive damages, arguing...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Buy Out at Fair Value - Current Issues in Closely Held Businesses Series: Part 5

Holland & Knight LLP on

The prior discussion, Determining a Remedy After Oppression or Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Part 4), presented a listing of the potential remedies on a finding of a breach of duty and oppression. Frequently, the animosity among...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Determining a Remedy After Oppression or Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Current Issues in Closely Held Businesses Series: Part 4

Holland & Knight LLP on

Once the court finds that oppression and/or a breach of fiduciary duty has occurred, it has to determine a remedy. Either by statute or within its equitable authority, the court may offer many alternative remedies...more

Winstead PC

Shareholder Oppression Claims: Looking Past the Urban Myth to Remedies that Continue to Survive in The Real World of Texas Law

Winstead PC on

Many Texas lawyers and their private company clients continue to refer to the claim for shareholder oppression as if it remains a viable cause of action under Texas law. And yet, for all practical purposes, the claim for...more

Winstead PC

Melancholy Minority Shareholders: Five-Years after Ritchie v. Rupe, No Cause for Celebration by Texas Private Company Investors

Winstead PC on

Almost five years have passed since the Texas Supreme issued its decision in Ritchie v. Rupe in 2014 abolishing shareholder oppression as a claim under common law by minority shareholders in private Texas companies....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Third Time’s Not a Charm in LLC Dissolution Case

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

As it approaches its sixth anniversary with little sign of letting up, the highly contentious litigation between brothers and business partners NIssim and Avraham Kassab is the gift that keeps on giving, at least to us...more

Winstead PC

Court Holds That Majority Shareholders In Closely Held Corporation Do Not Owe Fiduciary Duties To Minority Shareholders

Winstead PC on

In Herring Bancorp, Inc. v. Mikkelsen, a corporation acquired a majority of the outstanding shares of preferred stock by “repurchasing” those shares in accordance with the articles of incorporation, including the shares owned...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Episode 8: Minority Oppression in the LLC: Interview With Professor Douglas Moll

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The combination of majority rule and lack of exit rights leaves minority members of LLCs vulnerable to oppressive conduct by the majority, yet unlike legislation in most states giving dissolution and buy-out remedies to...more

Porter Hedges LLP

Business Litigation Alert: "Legislative Update: Is There a Future to Minority Shareholder Oppression in Texas?"

Porter Hedges LLP on

“Minority shareholder oppression” is a legal claim that occurs when the majority shareholders in a closely held corporation engage in “oppressive” action that unfairly prejudices the minority shareholder’s interests. In...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Can a Minority Shareholder Force the Majority to Buy Their Interest?

Holland & Knight LLP on

The question often arises whether a minority shareholder can require the majority to buy his interest in a privately held company. The answer, as a general matter, is that absent an agreement that provides for the purchase,...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Supreme Court of Canada Revisits Oppression

Bennett Jones LLP on

A corporation's failure to follow legal formalities under the Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985 c C-44 [CBCA] does not, by itself, establish oppression, the Supreme Court recently held in Mennillo v Intramodal inc.,...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Feeling Oppressed? Not if it’s from a Breach of Contract, Says Court of Appeal

In Shefsky v. California Gold Mining Inc., the Alberta Court of Appeal (Court) upheld the chambers judge’s decision and dismissed the appeal of Martin Shefsky in a fight for control of the board of directors of California...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Restarting the Clock: Court of Appeal Affirms Two-Year Limitation Period for Oppression Remedy Cases

In its recent decision in Maurice v. Alles, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that oppression remedy claims under the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA) must be commenced within the general two-year limitation period...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Aiding and Abetting Shareholder Oppression?

Holland & Knight LLP on

Earlier this summer, in Brown v. Pennington, No. 05-14-01349-CV, 2015 WL 3958618 (Tex. App., June 30, 2015), the Texas Court of Appeals dismissed a tort claim against a non-shareholder loan guarantor for lack of personal...more

Bennett Jones LLP

A Little Less Murky: The Court of Appeal Clarifies the Line Between Oppression and Derivative Actions

Bennett Jones LLP on

On May 26, 2015, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its decision in Rea et al v Wildeboer, clarifying the distinct role of derivative actions under the Ontario Business Corporations Act. The role is so distinct that the...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

The Texas Supreme Court Decision in Ritchie v. Rupe

On June 20, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in Ritchie v. Rupe, 2014 Tex. LEXIS 500 (Tex. 2014). In Ritchie, a minority shareholder in a closely held corporation attempted to force the majority shareholders...more

Jackson Walker

Texas Supreme Court's Recent Shareholder Oppression Opinions Reaffirm Primacy of Common Law Fiduciary Duties Under Gearhart

Jackson Walker on

In three recent cases, the Texas Supreme Court has made it clear that for claims of "minority shareholder oppression" — essentially, acts of a majority shareholder group that are harmful to a minority shareholder without...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Recent Shareholder Oppression Case Uncovers Family Business Disputes

Holland & Knight LLP on

Wisniewski v. Walsh, an interesting unpublished decision by a New Jersey appellate court, involves more than 10 years of a family dispute over a business. The litigation covers a wide range of issues, including how siblings,...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide