Following the Pennsylvania Superior Court determination that “regular use exclusions” in UM/UIM policies violated the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) in 2021, and in light of the post-Gallagher decisions,...more
In Erie Insurance Exchange v. Mione, ---A.3d--- 2023 WL 2008314 (Pa. Feb. 15, 2023), the insured was involved in an accident while operating his motorcycle, which was insured by a Progressive Insurance policy, wherein he...more
On February 15, 2023, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that household vehicle exclusions were “valid and enforceable,” and may be relied upon by auto insurers to exclude UM/UIM coverage in certain contexts. In Erie...more
On June 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania granted allowance of appeal in Rush v. Erie Insurance Exchange regarding the issue of whether the Superior Court erred “by finding that the ‘regular use exclusion’ contained...more
For more than a decade, medical providers have tried to limit the discretion of automobile insurers to pay less than the billed amount for services and equipment offered to injured insureds. Most of these efforts involve...more