News & Analysis as of

Parent Corporation Antitrust Provisions

K&L Gates LLP

Brussels Regulatory Brief: October - November 2021

K&L Gates LLP on

ANTITRUST AND COMPETITION - The EU General Court Upheld the Commission’s Fines for Gun Jumping - On 25 February 2015, a French telecom company notified to the Commission (its proposed acquisition of a Portuguese multimedia...more

WilmerHale

Antitrust and Competition: Investment Firms Voting Rights - The Devil is in the Potential Antitrust Liability

WilmerHale on

On January 27, 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) issued an important ruling regarding an investment fund’s liability for the cartel behaviour of an affiliate. The CJEU confirmed that an investment fund...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Cartels — Presumption of Decisive Influence by the Parent Company on Its Subsidiaries and Solidarity for the Payment of the...

On Oct. 28, 2020, the European Court of Justice ruled on one of the aspects of the proceedings relating to the power cable cartel, for which the main European, Japanese and South Korean manufacturers were fined a total of...more

Troutman Pepper

No-Poach Franchise Case Dismissed Under Single-Entity Rule

Troutman Pepper on

Are franchisees dependent offshoots of their franchisors, or are they standalone businesses capable of independent decision-making?...more

Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog

FTC Challenges Long-Term Non-Competes in Connection with Merger

The Federal Trade Commission has issued an administrative complaint challenging Axon Enterprise, Inc.’s consummated acquisition of its body-worn camera systems competitor VieVu, LLC from parent company from Safariland....more

Jones Day

EU's Highest Court Expands Cartel Damages Liability for Corporate Parents and Successors

Jones Day on

The Development: The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled that parent companies and economic successors can be held liable for damages caused by a subsidiary or acquired company in cartel cases. This significantly broadens...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Can a Subsidiary Conspire with Its Parent?

Epstein Becker & Green on

A violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act requires an agreement between two or more separate economic entities. In Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (1984), the Supreme Court of the United States...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide