News & Analysis as of

Patent-in-Suit Patent Infringement Section 101

Alston & Bird

Patent Case Summaries | Week Ending June 13, 2025

Alston & Bird on

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc., No. 2023-2267 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) June 9, 2025). Opinion by Lourie, joined by Dyk and Reyna....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Stanford Asks Supreme Court to Revisit Subject Matter Eligibility on Diagnostic Claims

"Hope springs eternal [in the human breast]" (Alexander Pope) and "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results" (the latter attributed variably to Albert Einstein and Werner Erhart) are two...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - April 2023 #3

Sequoia Technology, LLC v. Dell, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2021-2263, -2264, -2265, -2266 (Fed. Cir. April 12, 2023) In an appeal from a stipulated judgment of noninfringement and invalidity following an adverse claim construction...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Stark Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 After Finding Patent-in-Suit Is Not Directed to an Abstract...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Order entered by the Honorable Leonard P. Stark following oral argument in Invitae Corp. v. Natera, Inc., Civil Action No. 21-669-LPS (D.Del. November 29, 2021), the Court denied defendant Natera’s motion to...more

Jones Day

Federal Court Relies on PTAB Findings in Denying Section 101 Summary Judgment Motion

Jones Day on

Despite the prohibition on patenting “abstract ideas” and the tendency of computer software claims to fall into that category, claims directed at improving faulty software systems may still be patentable if they encompass an...more

Alston & Bird

Patent Case Summaries

Alston & Bird on

A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Endo Pharms. Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., C.A. No. 17-1240, 1455, 1887, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 9189 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 28, 2019)....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss In Part After Finding Two Of The Patents-In-Suit Are Directed To...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S et al., Civil Action No. 17-1646-LPS-CJB (D.Del. September 7, 2018) and Align Technology, Inc. v. 3Shape A/S et al.,...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Successful Section 101 Motion to Dismiss: Digital Ad Delivery Is Abstract Concept

On March 1, 2018, United States District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer (S.D.N.Y.) granted defendants’—Charter Communications, Inc. and Spectrum Management Holding Company, LLC (together, “Charter”)—motion to dismiss a patent...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. v. First Internet Bank of Indiana (E.D. Tex.)

Business Method / Software Patent Invalidated for Claiming Ineligible Subject Matter - In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. (ITS) sued First Internet Bank...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Judge Bianco Holds EasyWeb’s “Publishing Patent” Is Not Infringed Even Though It Broadly Claims an Abstract Idea

On March 30, 2016, District Court Judge Joseph F. Bianco granted defendant Twitter Inc.’s (“Twitter”) motions for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement against plaintiff EasyWeb Innovations, LLC (“EasyWeb”),...more

Morris James LLP

Court Rules On Objections To Report And Recommendation Regarding Section 101 Unpatentability Arguments

Morris James LLP on

Stark, C. J. Court rules on objections to magistrate’s report and recommendations regarding defendants’ assertions that asserted claims in the patents-in-suit were directed to unpatentable subject matter. Briefing on...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit’s Post-Alice Eligibility Analysis of Business Methods

Foley & Lardner LLP on

The Federal Circuit in Ultramercial, Inc. v. WildTangent, Inc., held that an “entrepreneurial” multi-step process for distributing copyrighted media products over the Internet to consumers is not patent-eligible under 35...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Third Time Is the Charm for WildTangent Challenge of Patent Eligibility of Ultramercial Patent

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In its third opinion reviewing the same district court decision, the Federal Circuit this time affirmed the district court’s grant of WildTangent’s motion to dismiss Ultramercial’s patent infringement complaint because the...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide