News & Analysis as of

Patents Motion for JMOL Patent Litigation

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Slicing Through Insufficient Evidence of Infringement, Willfulness, and Damages

The sufficiency of evidence required to support a denial of a motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial for infringement, willful infringement, and damages....more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: March 2023

Fish & Richardson on

March's Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up covers decisions addressing post-verdict JMOL, the point at which cases become exceptional, and the standard for amending invalidity contentions, among other issues....more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up - October 2021

Fish & Richardson on

This post summarizes some of the significant developments related to patent litigation in federal district courts of Texas for the month of October 2021....more

Haug Partners LLP

Are Biopharma Genus Patent Claims Dead?

Haug Partners LLP on

A recent Supreme Court petition for certiorari alleges that genus claims are no longer viable under the Federal Circuit’s recent application of enablement and written description law.The petition has huge ramifications not...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - April 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Just Because Something May Result From a Prior Art Teaching Does Not Make it Inherent in that Teaching - In Personal Web Technologies, LLC v. Apple, Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1599, the Federal Circuit clarified that the mere...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Andrews Denies Both Plaintiff And Defendant’s JMOL Motions And Plaintiff’s Motion For New Trial On Damages Following Jury...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum and Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel Corp., Civil Action No. 15-0033-RGA-MPT (D.Del. August 14, 2018), the Court denied Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Concrete Solution to Computer Problem Is Patent Eligible

Affirming a series of district court rulings, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found claims directed to software menus that display a limited subset of commonly used functions—useful in conserving space on...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendant’s Renewed JMOL Motion After Finding Patent-In-Suit Invalid For Lack Of Enablement

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-846-LPS (D.Del. February 16, 2018), the District Court granted in part Defendant Gilead...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit, With Some Significant Cases from 2016

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide