News & Analysis as of

Patents Novartis Patent Litigation

Irwin IP LLP

Federal Circuit Finds Loophole Allowing Patents To Cover Later Developed Technologies

Irwin IP LLP on

In re Entresto, 125 F.4th 1090 (Fed. Cir. 2025) - After Novartis’ patent on the blockbuster blood pressure medication Entresto was found invalid at the district court for covering technology that was developed after the...more

BakerHostetler

A Later-Discovered Improvement to an Invention Cannot Be Used To Reach Back and Invalidate an Earlier-Filed Patent

BakerHostetler on

Novartis markets and sells a combination therapy of valsartan and sacubitril under the brand name Entresto® for the treatment of various forms of heart failure. MSN submitted an Abbreviated New Drug Application seeking...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan) - Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra, Civ. No. 24-cv-2234 (DLF), 2024 WL 4492072 (D.D.C. Oct. 15, 2024) (Friedrich, J.)  Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Entresto®...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Orange Book Patents Can Be Delisted If They Do Not Claim Active Ingredient

WilmerHale on

Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions - TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC [OPINION] (2024-1936, 12/20/2024) (Prost, Taranto, Hughes) - Prost, J. The...more

Lathrop GPM

Federal Circuit Upholds Validity of Entresto Patent In Precedential Decision Concerning Written Description and Enablement

Lathrop GPM on

In a Jan. 10 precedential ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the validity of the U.S. patent covering Novartis’s blockbuster drug Entresto was upheld, reversing an earlier decision by the...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. MSN Pharms. Inc. - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. MSN Pharms. Inc., Civ. No. 20-MD-2930-RGA, 2024 WL 3756787 (D. Del. Aug. 12, 2024)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Hetero USA Inc. - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Hetero USA Inc., Civ. No. 20-md-2930-RGA, 2024 WL 3757086 (D. Del. Aug. 12, 2024)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra - Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Becerra, No. 24-CV-02234 (DLF), 2024 WL 3823270 (D.D.C. Aug. 13, 2024) (Friedrich, J.)....more

Venable LLP

The First Biosimilar Disputes at the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Venable LLP on

As the era of biologics and biosimilar litigations heats up in the United States, Europe’s Unified Patent Court (UPC) is also taking center stage with the first two biosimilar disputes filed in March and April....more

Kilpatrick

Sound of Silence: Petition to the Supreme Court, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc

Kilpatrick on

Novartis and Accord Healthcare, Inc. are embroiled in a patent infringement suit concerning Novartis’ blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya. Our previous articles Sound of Silence: Claiming Negative Limitations, and...more

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook

“Negative” Patent Claim Limitations—May They be Adequately Described by Omission?

Patent claim limitations that are “negative”—that is, claim limitations specifying the absence of a particular element from the patent claim—can pose a dilemma in the written description context. How much of the specification...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Newsletter - January 2022 (Chinese)

Knobbe Martens on

避而不谈可能支持否定性权利要求限定 - 在 Novartis Pharmaceuticals 诉 Accord Healthcare Inc. 一案(上诉案件编号:21- 1070)中,联邦巡回上诉法院认为,一项对药物“速效剂量”避而不谈的专利申请,为要求不存在此类剂量的否定 性权利要求限制提供了书面说明支持。 ...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Newsletter - January 2022 (Japanese)

Knobbe Martens on

記述がないことがクレームの否定的限定のサポートと解釈できる場合がある Federal Circuit は、Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Accord Healthcare Inc. (Appeal No. 21-1070) に おいて、薬剤の「初回負荷用量」についての記述がない特許出願は、そのような用量がないことを要 求するクレームの否定的限定に記述によるサポートを提供していることになると判示した。 ...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - January 2022

Knobbe Martens on

January 2022 Federal Circuit Newsletter (Japanese) January 2022 Federal Circuit Newsletter (Chinese)  Silence May Support Negative Claim Limitation In Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Accord Healthcare Inc. Appeal No. 21-1070, the...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch - January 2022

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION v. HEC PHARM CO., LTD. [OPINION] (2021-1070, January 3, 2021) (MOORE, LINN and O’MALLEY) - O’Malley, J. Affirming district court decision...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. V. Accord Healthcare INC.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., No. 18-1043-KAJ (D. Del. August 10, 2020) (Jordan, J.)... Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Gilenya® (fingolimod); U.S. Patent No. 9,187,405 (“the ’405...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Piramal Healthcare US Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Piramal Healthcare US Ltd. v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., No. 19-12651 (SRC), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38849 (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2020) (Chesler, J.)....more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Article III Standing Strikes Again

Troutman Pepper Locke on

Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Appeal No. 2018-2273 (Fed. Cir., April 23, 2020). Argentum and other petitioners filed IPRs against Novartis’ patent related to methods of treating...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

CAR T-Cell Therapy Takes Off and Brings on Patent Litigation

CAR T-Cell therapy, a new biologic therapy, is taking off. As companies continue to develop this new and promising therapy, patent litigation inevitably follows.  ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Life Sciences Court Report - January 2020

About Life Sciences Court Report:  We will periodically report on recently filed biotech and pharma litigation. ...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., C.A. No. 18-1043-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104969 (D. Del. June 24, 2019) (Stark, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., C.A. No. 18-1043-LPS, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101106 (D. Del. June 17, 2019) (Stark, J.)....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharma Co. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharma Co. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l, No. 2018-1434, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14122 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2019) (Circuit Judges Stoll, Plager, and Clevenger presiding; Opinion by Stoll, J.) (Appeal from D. Del.,...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

District of Delaware Dismisses ANDA Applicant for Lack of Venue under TC Heartland and In re Cray

On June 17, 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, in Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., et al., No. 18-cv-01043, held that venue was not proper in Delaware over Mylan...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - February 2019

Smart & Biggar on

Orders of prohibition relating to polymorphic form patent for PRISTIQ upheld on appeal - As previously reported, the Federal Court, in a pair of decisions, granted orders prohibiting Apotex and Teva from marketing their...more

70 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide