News & Analysis as of

Patents Patent Litigation Fitbit

McDermott Will & Emery

Moving to Recuse? Too Little, Too Late

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that waiting until well after an adverse summary judgment motion to move for a district court judge’s recusal is untimely and moot, especially where an appeal from the...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

What Took You So Long? District Court Denies Leave to Amend Patent Infringement Contentions Finding Plaintiff Didn’t Act...

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently denied a motion by Philips North America seeking leave of the Court to amend its claims of patent infringement against Fitbit to include several...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom (N.D. Cal. 2017)

Software Patent Directed to Pairing Activity Trackers to a Device Considered Patent-Eligible - In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division), Fitbit, Inc., sued Aliphcom (d/b/a...more

Fenwick & West LLP

AliceStorm in the Dog Days of Summer

Fenwick & West LLP on

Over the past two months, the trends I've discussed in my previous blogs on AliceStorm have continued and become more entrenched. In particular, the Federal Circuit has been quite active, issuing nine decisions since late...more

Franczek P.C.

Jawbone Cries Foul – Fitbit’s Success Due To Stolen Trade Secrets

Franczek P.C. on

Fitbit better watch its step because Jawbone has a serious bone to pick with its competitor. On May 27, 2015, Jawbone, a maker of wearable fitness and activity tracker devices, filed suit in California state court...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide