News & Analysis as of

Patents Prior Art Allergan Inc

Foley & Lardner LLP

The Value Of Prophetic Examples

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision that upheld the validity of the Allergan patents relating to Lumigan® 0.01% glaucoma eye drops against obviousness, written...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Lumigan Patents Upheld by Unexpected Results

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court decision that upheld the validity of the Allergan patents relating to Lumigan® 0.01% glaucoma eye drops. This decision shows that it is still...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. (Fed. Cir.)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., No. 2013-1245, -1246, -1247, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10710 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2014) (Circuit Judges Prost, Reyna and Chen presiding; Opinion by Prost, C.J.; Dissent-in-part by Chen,...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - Volume 3 | Issue 5 - May 2013

Knobbe Martens on

In This Issue: • Patent Office Must Prove Prior Art Reference Is Enabling • Complaint Was Adequate Despite Non-Infringing Possibilities • FDA Approval Not Relevant to Obviousness Analysis - Excerpt from...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Can a method of treatment claim be inherent in the prior art if neither the formulation nor the method of using the formulation twice a day were in the prior art? ...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide