News & Analysis as of

Peer Review Physicians Appeals

Polsinelli

Preclusion Doctrines and Peer Review: Arizona Hospital Peer Review Process Given Same Preclusive Effect as Court Judgment

Polsinelli on

You only get one bite at the apple. Lawyers use this expression to describe the legal concept that a cause of action may not be relitigated after it has already been judged on the merits. The twin components of this concept...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Peer Review Immunity is a Bar to Doctor's Allegations of Defamation

When a doctor is subject to a formal peer review proceeding, those involved must pay close attention to the medical staff bylaw and any hospital policies, procedures, and rules governing the process. These protections require...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

PA appellate court holds that physician credentialing file is not protected by the state peer review privilege

Bricker Graydon LLP on

In a highly unfavorable peer review decision, Leadbitter v. Keystone Anesthesia v. Petraglia, entered on February 12, 2020, a Pennsylvania state appellate court upheld an order compelling a hospital to produce the unredacted...more

ArentFox Schiff

Update: California Court of Appeal Orders Publication of Natarajan V. Dignity Health

ArentFox Schiff on

Natarajan addressed an important question: When may physicians who are the subject of a peer review hearing challenge the hearing officer in their cases on the ground that the hearing officer is biased? We have published a...more

ArentFox Schiff

Court of Appeal Rejects Bias Challenge to Peer Review Hearing Officer

ArentFox Schiff on

The case, Natarajan v. Dignity Health, attracted keen interest as the physician’s arguments, if adopted, would likely have disqualified numerous experienced hearing officers from service in California medical staff peer...more

Buchalter

Managing Problematic Hospital-Based Physicians in Light of Economy v. Sutter East Bay Hospitals

Buchalter on

Until recently, hospital-based medical groups frequently complied with a hospital’s request to remove a physician without any restrictions. In light of a recent California Appellate Court decision, however, hospitals and...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Test for Employee Status

On May 8, 2019, the Seventh Circuit reaffirmed its test for determining employee status under federal anti-discrimination laws, holding that a physician lacked standing to bring Title VII claims against the hospital at which...more

Buchalter

California Appellate Court Decision Impacts Ability to Terminate Hospital-Based Physicians

Buchalter on

Until recently, hospital-based medical groups frequently complied with a hospital’s request to remove a physician without any restrictions. In light of a recent California Appellate Court decision, however, hospitals and...more

Fisher Phillips

3.8 Million Reasons Why Proper Process in Physician Discipline Matters

Fisher Phillips on

Any avid watcher of medical dramas would tell you that a hospital always has the ability to cut ties with any doctor who is not up to snuff. (For podcast fans we highly recommend Dr. Death.) They would tell you this is...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Florida Supreme Court: Physicians' Peer Reviews Not Protected from Public Disclosure

Holland & Knight LLP on

• The Florida Supreme Court has reversed a decision of the Florida Second District Court of Appeal and held that an analysis of a medical malpractice claim sent by an attorney to an external medical review company in...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide